BPDFamily.com

Relationship Partner with BPD (Straight and LGBT+) => Romantic Relationship | Conflicted About Continuing, Divorcing/Custody, Co-parenting => Topic started by: livednlearned on October 10, 2013, 05:19:22 PM



Title: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 10, 2013, 05:19:22 PM
Divorced from N/BPDx who is a former trial lawyer. He is representing himself. I have sole custody of S12.

Today we were back in court, same judge. I filed a motion for contempt to get N/BPDx to refinance the house (14 months overdue) and to get the title to my car.

Which I got!  :)  Yippee!

Judge gave N/BPDx until January 2014 to refinance the house. <sigh>  But he did find N/BPDx in contempt, and said N/BPDx must pay my legal fees. He still owes me legal fees from our last go-round in court. He has a week to pay those fees. If he doesn't, I file another motion for contempt, and we go back to court.

My L says next time, if N/BPDx doesn't comply, it's jail.

L said to me, "You are so calm." I don't know if it's calm, or numb.

I can't believe I ever loved N/BPDx. I can't believe I used to be who I was. Wish we all got to move on after we learned whatever lesson this is.







Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: HarmKrakow on October 10, 2013, 05:39:36 PM
Nobody wins in situations like this.

I assume a normal human being, a sane person, would not enjoy victory over another person, no matter how deep the hatred is. A sane person would not keep grudges and move on. On the other hand, if you have to make a decision, it's always better to end up with the win rather than the loss. But it's all materialistic victories.

What do we truly gain from a materialistic victory, although the victory itself can hold some mental strength? Marriage and rights and all those others things are stuff we invented as humans and we are supposed to attach certain feelings with that? Gimme a break :P

Well done on the win of course


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: Forward2free on October 10, 2013, 05:48:09 PM
  None of this is easy and you're doing a great job staying on task. Congratulations on your win!

You've come so far emotionally - that's why you can see the relationship for what it was and N/BPDxh for who he is. If you saw him like that all those years ago, you wouldn't be here now. That's a massive step forward xxx

Not being in his space/control any more is the biggest win and the best gift to yourself - everything else is just cream on top.

Here's hoping he comes through with the refinancing and the money he owes you... .


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 11, 2013, 10:12:53 AM
Last night I get an email from N/BPDx.

He wants to take S12 to a women's shelter and bring them food.

He wants to go with S12 for an hour. Pick him up tonight at 5pm, drop him off at home at 6pm. Stop and get a cookie.

Guys, this is one crazy disorder.



Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: momtara on October 11, 2013, 10:57:11 AM
So what are you going to do?

That's a shame because on its face it seems like a noble thing to do, which is how he uses it to make you feel bad, I guess.  Sounds like something my hubby would do.

Do you think he'd really do it?

Anyway... .

Since he has to make good by January, why don't you schedule a little celebration for yourself for after that - maybe an overnight at a hotel or a little trip in February?  Nobody wins, but you can celebrate that you're moving forward.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 11, 2013, 11:14:26 AM
So what are you going to do?

That's a shame because on its face it seems like a noble thing to do, which is how he uses it to make you feel bad, I guess.  Sounds like something my hubby would do.

Do you think he'd really do it?

It's so weird. N/BPDx's psych eval explicitly calls him a misogynist, and points out how N/BPDx appears to have no awareness of the emotional lives of his mother, sister, or three ex wives. I came within an inch of filing a restraining order against him, only reason I didn't was because I was too scared. I've spent hours at the DV shelter getting counseling about how to stay safe. He scores a 9 out of 10 on Gavin de Becker's MOSAIC threat assessment test to predict if someone is dangerous.

And yet N/BPDx wants to take food to a women's shelter.



S12 says he wants to go. N/BPDx's email was brief, no insults or threats, just a request. Maybe I'm just a big sucker, but I told S12 he could go.

Excerpt
Anyway... .

Since he has to make good by January, why don't you schedule a little celebration for yourself for after that - maybe an overnight at a hotel or a little trip in February?  Nobody wins, but you can celebrate that you're moving forward.

I'm celebrating in two weeks  :)  Taking the first vacation I've had in over 10 years, at least one that isn't organized around a family obligation or work trip. It's a real vacation! I can't wait.



Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: ForeverDad on October 11, 2013, 11:45:35 AM
The timing is suspicious... .  He just looked bad in court - obstructing financial closure for his exwife so now he wants to do something to help other women?  Are they victims or just financially disadvantaged?  So he'll willingly go out of his way to 'help' them but not you... .

Why would they let him in the door?  Is he shopping for W#5?

Seems to me that he wanted to bring S12 to lend innocuous legitimacy to his visit.  If he has time with S12 periodically, then you could have told him he can do it on his time.  Trojan Horse sort of tactic?


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 11, 2013, 11:55:38 AM
The timing is suspicious... . He just looked bad in court - obstructing financial closure for his exwife so now he wants to do something to help other women?  Are they victims or just financially disadvantaged?

Why would they let him in the door?  Is he shopping for W#5?

Seems to me that he wanted to bring S12 to lend legitimacy to his action.

I think somewhere in his disordered head, he thinks if he does something good for battered women, it erases all his nastiness. That, and he needs S12 to be his audience for narcissistic supply. Last month N/BPDx went and demonstrated with pro-choice advocates at our state capital and asked to take S12 but I said no.

I dunno.

It's anti-bullying week at S12's school, and a few nights ago he described different kinds of bullies that the teachers didn't talk about, and it made me realize he understands more about abuse at age 12 then I did at age 40.  S12 was describing generic bullying behavior, and I don't think he realized he was describing his dad, but he was. For example, S12 said there are bullies who will be mean to you, and then nice to you, and then mean to you. They try to confuse you about whether they are your friend or not. And then he said there is another kind of bully, who is nice to you when he wants something from you, or when no one is looking, and then when he's alone with you, he's a bully. I really think he understands who his dad is, but he's too young to really assert himself against his dad and I can't say I blame him.  





Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: whirlpoollife on October 11, 2013, 12:51:57 PM
You "won" on the title to your car. You fought for what is yours to begin with.

14 months to refinance the house but then he is given more time.

Yeah I see why you question the feel of "win"

My xtbh was and is very big on the audience thing.  All show ,not a drop of empathy except for himself.  Only those who live with this type understand what it is they are doing. 

I was advised to have a PFA on him (from the crisis shelter, not my current L,   because not to get off your topic but I have been receiving texts from an unknown number but the wording fits his) but how do I prove what he has done or is doing?

Your vacation time is well deserved!


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 11, 2013, 01:15:16 PM
I have been receiving texts from an unknown number but the wording fits his) but how do I prove what he has done or is doing?

Ugh. That's awful. Maybe a forensic IT investigator? I hired one to look at S12's phone when I suspected that N/BPDx had installed surveillance software on it. I guess if the number is a pre-paid phone, it would take a lot of tracking to figure out who owns the phone. Still! Anything that involves digital data has to be traceable.

Is he threatening you?


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: Free One on October 11, 2013, 07:05:45 PM
Excerpt
It's anti-bullying week at S12's school, and a few nights ago he described different kinds of bullies that the teachers didn't talk about, and it made me realize he understands more about abuse at age 12 then I did at age 40.  S12 was describing generic bullying behavior, and I don't think he realized he was describing his dad, but he was. For example, S12 said there are bullies who will be mean to you, and then nice to you, and then mean to you. They try to confuse you about whether they are your friend or not. And then he said there is another kind of bully, who is nice to you when he wants something from you, or when no one is looking, and then when he's alone with you, he's a bully. I really think he understands who his dad is, but he's too young to really assert himself against his dad and I can't say I blame him.  

This is what winning is. This is what you are fighting for.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: scraps66 on October 12, 2013, 11:24:43 AM
I hate these stories and the way the court just goes along.  I played the same games to get the deed to my house, AFTER my ex had purchased her own house during the equitable distribution process where, thought she produced NO financial records for a period of 15 months, managed to come up with cash for a home purchase.  all the while she would not sign the deed over to me so I could refinance.  BTW - I was paying the mortgage all that time while she lived in the marital residence... .with her boyfriend!  They say the system stinks.  They're right.   


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 12, 2013, 12:06:59 PM
I hate these stories and the way the court just goes along.  I played the same games to get the deed to my house, AFTER my ex had purchased her own house during the equitable distribution process where, thought she produced NO financial records for a period of 15 months, managed to come up with cash for a home purchase.  all the while she would not sign the deed over to me so I could refinance.  BTW - I was paying the mortgage all that time while she lived in the marital residence... .with her boyfriend!  They say the system stinks.  They're right.  

The weirdest part of my hearing is that N/BPDx had filed a motion for contempt against me. I filed a motion for contempt to get N/BPDx to refi his house and hand over the car title. N/BPDx had filed a motion for contempt saying I had thwarted the refi.  

Because I thwarted him, he told the judge I caused him to forfeit fees, and rates have now gone up, so his new mortgage will be $400 more because of me, and he wanted to offset that increase against the alimony he pays me.

I almost don't even know how to explain the stuff with the car title because it's so paranoid and convoluted, it's hard to even describe. Way back in 2011, I signed over the title to his car during mediation. Also part of the order, N/BPDx agreed to finish paying the car loan for my car as part of alimony. Which he did. A year later, I realized that I didn't receive any registration notices for my car, so I contact DMV and change the address, renew my tags, and that's that. A year after that, I ask N/BPDx to send me the title to my car, since the loan was paid off. This seems to alert him that he has not received notice to renew his tags, so he checks DMV and sees that notification to renew his tags are being sent to my address. Anyone who knows anything about car registration knows you have to change ownership by transferring the title with DMV. Getting the title is just one step. Next step is to have the title transferred over in your name. N/BPDx didn't do that.

In court, he tells the judge that I tried to "claim ownership" of his car by changing the address for the car with DMV, so he refuses to give me the title to my car.    

He told the judge I was underhanded and devious, and that the court has been deceived by my distortions and lies for 3 years, and it was time the truth came out. He kept saying, "I realize this sounds paranoid your honor, but LnL will go to any lengths to distort my character and set up these scenarios to make me look bad in court."

Judge just let N/BPDx go on and on about all this stuff. He also allowed N/BPDx to have his motion for contempt heard, even though it hadn't been noticed properly -- my L didn't receive the correct documentation until we arrived in court, instead of receiving it 2 weeks early, which is the protocol.

Then, when the judge ruled, he practically cooed all over N/BPDx, telling him stories about how frustrating the lenders were, and he understood how exasperating it was. Judge had done real estate law for 25 years and went on a tirade about Fannie Mae and Fannie Mac.

Then, when he ruled, he said, "N/BPDx, I really feel for you, I really do. But I have to find you in contempt because you are 14 months overdue with this, and even though it took 6 months to get to the closing, you still had a year to do it. Have the new offer close by Jan 2014."

Then he turned to me and explained very clearly how to make sure the car title was transferred over through DMV. I think he was trying to help save face for N/BPDx by telling me how it worked, instead of telling N/BPDx directly: Dude, title has to be transferred through DMV. LnL was not trying to claim ownership -- you had the title, you didn't finish the job with DMV.

All this to say: I asked my L why the judge listened to N/BPDx's long, bizarre conspiracy-theory-plot-twist crazy explanations about why he was filing a motion for contempt about me thwarting the mortgage refi. And why he was so gentle with the N/BPDx during the ruling.

L said that a few weeks ago a guy got an unfavorable ruling in court and then went downtown to a busy area and pulled out his gun and starting firing. Police arrived, could not disarm him, and ended up shooting and killing him. So the judges are being careful to make sure that everyone gets a chance to feel "heard" in court.

Whatevs. I don't know what I feel about that. I understand it, but I could also see that N/BPDx felt entitled, not defeated. Judge told us he didn't want to see us back in court, and N/BPDx turned to my L on the way out and said, See you back in court for the motion to stay. N/BPDx is planning on not paying my legal fees for the last hearing.   So the judge let N/BPDx feel heard, and it made N/BPDx feel empowered, even though he lost.

Also, last night N/BPDx didn't show to take S12 to the women's shelter. I didn't receive any emails or text messages. S12 didn't seem to care if his dad came or not, so just went back to doing what he was doing.



Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: Forward2free on October 13, 2013, 05:21:10 PM
It's just not fair, I hope you are okay.

I agree that he would feel empowered after the softly-softly approach   But he would also feel deeply entitled anyway.

Make sure you have what you need if/when he takes you back to court. Unfortunately the legal system is a massive playground for a  Narcissistic Lawyer. Seeing you getting stronger gives him more justification to punish you and he'll keep battling in court as long as he can to regain power and control.

In their minds, we are worthless and deserve nothing, not even the crumbs.

Be prepared that he may being trying to alienate you from S12. Perhaps his overt attempts to take food to shelters etc are to impress on your son that he wouldn't do xyz because ... .

I am sorry that S12 was stood up last night. It is the hardest thing to explain to kids and I guess he will soon be of an age that he can stop seeing his dad all together? So hard for the kids.

I hope he finds potential wife number 4, that should help feed his need for narcissistic supply and hopefully take the pressure off you and D12.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 14, 2013, 10:27:46 AM
It's just not fair, I hope you are okay.

I agree that he would feel empowered after the softly-softly approach   But he would also feel deeply entitled anyway.

Make sure you have what you need if/when he takes you back to court. Unfortunately the legal system is a massive playground for a  Narcissistic Lawyer. Seeing you getting stronger gives him more justification to punish you and he'll keep battling in court as long as he can to regain power and control.

In their minds, we are worthless and deserve nothing, not even the crumbs.

Be prepared that he may being trying to alienate you from S12. Perhaps his overt attempts to take food to shelters etc are to impress on your son that he wouldn't do xyz because ... .

I am sorry that S12 was stood up last night. It is the hardest thing to explain to kids and I guess he will soon be of an age that he can stop seeing his dad all together? So hard for the kids.

I hope he finds potential wife number 4, that should help feed his need for narcissistic supply and hopefully take the pressure off you and D12.

Thanks kormilda.

Apparently, N/BPDx is now filing a complaint against my L with the State Bar. For lying in court, telling the judge she had sent N/BPDx an affadavit from my real estate attorney    Not only did she send the affadavits by mail, she sent two email copies. His threats aren't even intelligent!

He has also filed a complaint against the parenting coordinator's professional organization because she "practiced law" by interpreting the order (incorrectly, according to him). He keeps losing in court, to the point the judge is making him pay my legal fees. So I guess he has to feel like he's "winning" some other way.

I received a bunch of emails this weekend from him, saying I have no soul, am heartless, blah blah blah.

Gah.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: ForeverDad on October 14, 2013, 12:16:16 PM
He's burning his bridges, not that he had any left, but if he did, they're gone now.

My ex tried to get me featured in an Amber Alert back when I took son with me on vacation during our temp order.  I had given advance notice but of course my then-stbEx had said No, as though her permission was needed.   (To this day I assume it was okay to go on vacation even though it was a simple temporary order.  After all, it turned out to last nearly two years.  It recognized holidays, so why not vacations?  My lawyer said to go anyway, he'd handle any flak.  And predictably there was flak.)  The deputy had told her it didn't meet the criteria for Amber Alert.  She escalated it and the sheriff's investigator agreed there was no action to be taken but did get get my lawyer to agree to call me and ask Me to call then-StbEx and let him speak with her.  Why she wouldn't call herself, well, that's what I had to deal with, she had to involve as many professionals as she could.  Well, she got upset with the investigator, stopped responding, so the investigator closed the case.  Months later my lawyer told me that my then-StbEx had escalated filed a complaint against the investigator.  Yes, she sure burned that bridge but good.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 14, 2013, 01:01:35 PM
He's burning his bridges, not that he had any left, but if he did, they're gone now.

My ex tried to get me featured in an Amber Alert back when I took son with me on vacation during our temp order.  I had given advance notice but of course my then-stbEx had said No, as though her permission was needed.   (To this day I assume it was okay to go on vacation even though it was a simple temporary order.  After all, it turned out to last nearly two years.  It recognized holidays, so why not vacations?  My lawyer said to go anyway, he'd handle any flak.  And predictably there was flak.)  The deputy had told her it didn't meet the criteria for Amber Alert.  She escalated it and the sheriff's investigator agreed there was no action to be taken but did get get my lawyer to agree to call me and ask Me to call then-StbEx and let him speak with her.  Why she wouldn't call herself, well, that's what I had to deal with, she had to involve as many professionals as she could.  Well, she got upset with the investigator, stopped responding, so the investigator closed the case.  Months later my lawyer told me that my then-StbEx had escalated filed a complaint against the investigator.  Yes, she sure burned that bridge but good.

I guess the moral of the story is don't tell her anything    Vacation? What vacation?

I'm also beginning to realize that anyone who touches my case eventually suffers. My L just hired a new associate, and he emailed the Motion for Contempt to N/BPDx for review. Sorry new L! You just entered hell.



Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: Forward2free on October 14, 2013, 04:59:03 PM
I'm also beginning to realize that anyone who touches my case eventually suffers. My L just hired a new associate, and he emailed the Motion for Contempt to N/BPDx for review. Sorry new L! You just entered hell.

That's ok, you don't have to worry about your L or L's associates. It's their job to deal with the scum of society and at least they are getting paid to put up with his nonsense. It sucks, but you can't protect them either.

Imagine how much you would have in the bank if you only received $1 per hour for dealing with N/BPDx BS... .


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 24, 2013, 07:03:35 PM
So... .

I was given the title to my car, right? That's one of the "wins" from being in court. N/BPDx gave my L the title to my car in front of the judge. He signed it. My L went to her office to have it notarized, then sent it to me.

I went to the DMV to have the title transferred. They valued the car and added it all up, then I gave them a check. We chatted a bit. They entered everything into the computer. Then they gave me the papers and I look down and see that I just transferred the title of HIS car to me.

N/BPDx gave me HIS car title in court.

It has to be a mistake, right? He's a lawyer. My lawyer is a lawyer! I can't believe this went through two lawyers, then me, and no one caught it.

So I had the DML guy back it out of the system. I know, I know, why not just leave it like that, right? 

Because I want the title to MY car.

Now I have the title to N/BPDx's car, but it has been notarized as though he is transferring the title. The title is no good anymore. At first, I started to ask about how to get N/BPDx a new title, and then my codependent alarm bells starting going off. Let him figure out how to get a duplicate title.

Then I asked DMV if I could get the title to my car without actually having the title, if I had a court ruling that I get the title. They said yes. The official order won't be entered until second week of November, so I can't do it right away, but I'm relieved that I don't have to go back to court with N/BPDx to try and get my title a SECOND time. Or is it a third time, I'm losing track. So for anyone here who ever encounters this, let it be known that you can get a duplicate title from the DMV if you have a court order from the judge.

I talked to my L and told her I wanted to take possession of N/BPDx's car in exchange for the $$$ in legal fees he owes me. I told her let N/BPDx take the bus to work. Or jail. I'm taking his car. 

Joking of course.

My L just filed a motion for contempt about N/BPDx not paying my legal fees. She is going to tell the judge that I have the title to his car, and can I take possession of it if N/BPDx does not pay me within 1 week.

So maybe he won't go to jail. I'll just get his car and sell it. And it's worth more than what my legal fees are worth.

And yes, I grew enough of a backbone over all this BS that I would gladly take ownership of his car and sell it.

I can't believe the irony of this. In court, N/BPDx kept claiming that I was trying to assert ownership of his car (because he didn't transfer the title after I signed it over to him, and when I changed my physical address with DMV, the address of his car directed toward me -- he thought that was me "claiming ownership of his car).

Then, when I was explaining the problem to DMV, they kept saying, "Are you saying you DON'T want to claim ownership of this vehicle?"

What a circus.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: Free One on October 24, 2013, 07:39:11 PM
It always seems like a comedy of errors with pwBPD, except it's not funny!

At least you have some progress!


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: ForeverDad on October 24, 2013, 09:05:12 PM
  Yes, keep your options open. :)

You know what his - I mean, your - title is, right?  Leverage! ... .or payment, who cares which?

So confounding, you can't reason with disordered people to behave better but they generally know the value of $$$.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: scraps66 on October 25, 2013, 11:33:15 AM
I've learned, or conditioned myself, to not give my uNPD/BPDexw any benefit of the doubt.  My gf claims I am "paranoid."  I am, and i'm sure it does come across as such - my psych eval confirmed this.  I have had it demonstrated for me time and again, the high IQ sociopathimind of these individuals astounds me, the creativity and the energy put into fabricating situations.  It may very well be the case that your ex knowingly and slyly willfully switched the titles knowing what would happen.  I'm disappointed, but, it is difficult to keep up with a sociopathic mind, they have this thinking engrained and it is difficult if not impossible to predict or understand how they come up with this stuff.   


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: ForeverDad on October 25, 2013, 03:31:36 PM
It may very well be the case that your ex knowingly and slyly willfully switched the titles knowing what would happen.

You'll never get a straight answer out of him.  If not an accidental switch, if he did it to purposely delay your case, then he messed up.  He's given you some leverage to get concessions out of him.  Either he pays up or the judge says you get your car and grants you his car too if he doesn't pay up.  After all, he's a lawyer, (1) he should know better and (2) he can always make more money.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 25, 2013, 03:59:33 PM
Maybe he did it on purpose, maybe not. At this point, I think his brain is so addled by alcohol that he isn't functioning well. I saw him in court and he sounds articulate, but nothing adds up. It doesn't make sense. It's like a little kid talking in a made-up foreign language. Only makes sense to the kid.

Gah, though. I. Just. Want. This. To. Be. Over.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: whirlpoollife on October 25, 2013, 05:14:12 PM
Maybe a forensic IT investigator?

Lnl, where would I look up an IT investigator?


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 25, 2013, 07:34:52 PM
Maybe a forensic IT investigator?

Lnl, where would I look up an IT investigator?

I found mine through my L. They have to have both IT skills and understand the law, otherwise their forensic investigation could actually contaminate the evidence. So lawyer networks will probably be able to recommend someone. If not your family lawyer, criminal defense lawyers.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: whirlpoollife on October 25, 2013, 07:42:10 PM
Ok thank you.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: NewWays on October 27, 2013, 06:02:13 PM
LivedNLearned... .

I am sorry that you have to go through all of this and wish you patience and peace as you travel you path.  Hopefully we all learn as we travel through the divorce process.

The unfortunate part of having a partner with a personality disorder makes it very likely ending such a relationship will be very stressful and difficult. Many of us know, and have experienced and have learned the hard way... .that our disordered partners with NPD or BPD are impacted by many issues that ultimately impacted us during our relationship as well as even more so during the divorce.

My therapist continues to remind me that now I am in the final phases of divorce... .that all the issues my wife has due to her personality disorder... .unfortunately in your case (and my case and most likely all of our cases) take on additional impact and cause our partners to exhibit more anomalous behaviors that makes getting divorced and your ex actually living up to all the court orders and agreements even more of a struggle.

Here are examples of what I am looking at in the dynamic with my wife…and her DBPD that are similar to what you have outlined:

Fear of Abandonment

I finally drew the line and told my wife that our marriage had disintegrated and that unless we both wanted to…and were committed to long term comprehensive therapy for a year or more was the only hope we had.  Even with all the unhealthy elements that existed in our marriage, this notice to my wife sparked an atomic blast of abandonment fear that caused that fear to escalate along with her extreme need to control that saw her file for the divorce.

Anger

My wife and her rage and anger would happen when after she would verbally and sometimes physically abuse me and I would detach and disengage to focus on me well being.  This behavior on my part was seen by my wife as me being neglectful, withholding, uncaring and abandoning that resulted in her anger and rage spiking to new levels driving her to file for the divorce rather that openly and honestly talking about the need for both of us to begin long term comprehensive therapy.

This new incremental anger has seemed to cause my wife to feel like a victim…and she believes and tells me that all the problems in our marriage are due to me and that she has been wronged and I have stolen and/or messed up the best years of her life because of me causing our marriage to fail.

I now hear this “Victim” rationale that she has replayed to friends, relative and her attorney that she uses to sway their opinions and continually reminds them to when they see me to remind me of my failures as a marriage partner and the ultimate cause of the marriage to fail!

Narcissist Element

This is the area that I fail to remind myself as often as I should and keep in my top of mind awareness and understanding and gets me into feeling frustrated when she acts out and I get frustrated without thinking of the possible reasons for her behavior.

In my sessions I have learned that with her Narcissist tendencies, she is very self-serving... .all during our marriage she has been exceptionally charming in public settings, yet has used that charm to get her way, while treating me with very little respect.

I have also learned that when a Narcissist falls in love with you, it is like a dream, because narcissists will love you for making them so happy…but it has little staying power or a loving relationship.  To narcissists when they decide you have wronged them and the marriage is over…your history together does not really exist…especially if you have disappointed a Narcissist or they feel like you failed and the failure of the marriage is your doing…whatever love you had after they decide to throw you away will not help the divorce to proceed with any mutual progress and they will often adopt the I must win at all costs attitude that will become the norm during and possibly even after the divorce if there are children involved or the divorce decree requires them to sell the house, refinance the house or pay-off credit card debt by a certain date and they will ignore you, the court orders and be in 100% contempt of both!

Winning... .I have set my expectations to not expect that!

I pray each day to just keep moving forward so the divorce can become final.  Each day I also pray even though I wanted a family... .I have been blessed that after we got married that she informed me she had changed her mind and that she had decided she was not going to have any children.

What she would have put the children thorugh would have been the worst.

NewWays


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 27, 2013, 07:29:01 PM
Hi NewWays,

Thanks so much for your thoughtful perspective -- this particularly caught me:

Excerpt
To narcissists when they decide you have wronged them and the marriage is over…your history together does not really exist…especially if you have disappointed a Narcissist or they feel like you failed and the failure of the marriage is your doing…whatever love you had after they decide to throw you away will not help the divorce to proceed with any mutual progress and they will often adopt the I must win at all costs attitude that will become the norm during and possibly even after the divorce if there are children involved or the divorce decree requires them to sell the house, refinance the house or pay-off credit card debt by a certain date and they will ignore you, the court orders and be in 100% contempt of both!

There have been so many hard parts along the way. But when I found myself cast as villain with no reasonable explanation why, and no possible way to redeem myself... .I just couldn't believe it. I still can't believe it. Being split black was one of the most psychologically shocking and awful things I had experienced. It took a long time to realize that it was traumatizing because it was crazy. The reason you can't repair the relationship isn't because you failed. It's because your partner was crazy. And crazy, the way I experienced it, was discovering that N/BPDx lacked empathy. The paranoia and mania also didn't help.

After I told friends that I was awarded sole custody, they were happy. I didn't feel happy, though. I felt relief that trial was over. I felt exhausted. I felt certain that the outcome was just and appropriate. I knew that sole custody meant less worrying, but that it wouldn't eliminate the worrying. I knew I would be able to travel across the border to see my family. But the irony is that this whole thing strained my relationship with my family so badly there almost isn't even a family to go visit.

I feel like I just survived a battle and I'm walking around a war-torn village where everything has to be rebuilt. But at least we're safe and the pillaging is over for now.

I'm in a new relationship with someone I am 99.9% certain doesn't have a PD. But I feel hollowed out by this experience. Sometimes I wonder how close you can ever feel to someone after going through a PD relationship. I don't even try to explain. I go silent a lot when certain topics come up because it takes too much effort to try and explain how disorienting life is with a pwBPD.

I'm glad you're getting through the divorce process -- it sounds like you understand the disorder so well. I think that helps, even if it doesn't fully heal things.



Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: NewWays on October 27, 2013, 11:09:42 PM
Excerpt

I'm in a new relationship with someone I am 99.9% certain doesn't have a PD. But I feel hollowed out by this experience. Sometimes I wonder how close you can ever feel to someone after going through a PD relationship. I don't even try to explain. I go silent a lot when certain topics come up because it takes too much effort to try and explain how disorienting life is with a pwBPD.

Just reading a part of your reply makes me really feel a sense of concern for you.  How can you be certain?  I know many of us feel since we have ended a marriage with a person that is personality disordered with NPD, BPD, etc., that we are experts at now being able to see this in a person and/or a new partner.

My therapist tells me to not be so sure that the ability to immediately see those terrible traits is at its highest level after the person is out of your life.  He notes that the awarness comes with a blend of healing, time and a retrospection that you undergo with possible new partners that is cognitive based rather than emotionally based.  His warning is based upon what he explained relates to that as a partner of an individual that has NPD or BPD traits, we as a that type of partner have issues and work to do since we were in such a relationship to begin with and made decision to stay... .before our divorce.

He points out to be careful... .since many of us have pleaser, fixer, sense of self, and other possible co-dependency issues that we need to really understand as part of that healing.

He further explained this and asked me to think back to previous relationships that I could recall that were at least 6 years past or more and to tell him one element of that relationship that now that I have awarness of PD and what better boundaries are that I believe could have had PD issues... .but asked that it be such relationship that I really wanted to save and keep but failed.

What I expained to him and he commented back to me about was a past relationship with a woman I loved very much, but back then, I did not know what female partner to male partner verbal and/emotional abuse was or even existed.  When I explained to him that one of the most painful parts of that past relationship was when my partner would become extremely angry... .more than seemed reasonable and that she would stop talking to me for days and sometimes weeks... .even with me trying to re-engage, repair the damage of the angry interaction... .and... .what I thought was something I had done and asked that we go to counseling to try and improve and find a way to not let these negative interactions damage our relationship... .which she refused and would not go.

He indicated that some of the traits that we all have exhibited with our current spouse that we divorce or are divorcing that is personality disordered... .in fact enables the damage the relationship does to us and... .and he pointed out... .most of the time past behavior that we exhibited showed evidence that we can point out to some degree in previous relationships.

So... .be care... .I know you feel for sure... .at a 99.9% level... .but that .1% can be high risk since at the time you bonded with you ex-husband, I'm sure you felt 100% before you married that this was the right person for you for life.

Just passing on what my T reminds me about... .when the topic ever get to the subject of what about new relationships... .and points out that as far as personality disordered partners, repetition is not the key to learning and that repeating a relationship with someone who has traits like your ex... .is NOT AN OPTION!

On another note... .I need to tell you how much I admire your tenacity and keeping it all together going thorugh this with children as a part of the equation.

I cannot even begin to try and imagine what I would be dealing with if we had a family... .so for what you and all the others on this site that have children try to do the best they can do with their children with a personality disordered spouse... .I take my hat off to all of you... .and must say I could not do what you do each day in addition to protect your kids.

NewWays


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on October 28, 2013, 02:04:22 PM
Just reading a part of your reply makes me really feel a sense of concern for you.  How can you be certain?  I know many of us feel since we have ended a marriage with a person that is personality disordered with NPD, BPD, etc., that we are experts at now being able to see this in a person and/or a new partner.

My therapist tells me to not be so sure that the ability to immediately see those terrible traits is at its highest level after the person is out of your life.  He notes that the awarness comes with a blend of healing, time and a retrospection that you undergo with possible new partners that is cognitive based rather than emotionally based.  His warning is based upon what he explained relates to that as a partner of an individual that has NPD or BPD traits, we as a that type of partner have issues and work to do since we were in such a relationship to begin with and made decision to stay... .before our divorce.

He points out to be careful... .since many of us have pleaser, fixer, sense of self, and other possible co-dependency issues that we need to really understand as part of that healing.

He further explained this and asked me to think back to previous relationships that I could recall that were at least 6 years past or more and to tell him one element of that relationship that now that I have awarness of PD and what better boundaries are that I believe could have had PD issues... .but asked that it be such relationship that I really wanted to save and keep but failed.

What I expained to him and he commented back to me about was a past relationship with a woman I loved very much, but back then, I did not know what female partner to male partner verbal and/emotional abuse was or even existed.  When I explained to him that one of the most painful parts of that past relationship was when my partner would become extremely angry... .more than seemed reasonable and that she would stop talking to me for days and sometimes weeks... .even with me trying to re-engage, repair the damage of the angry interaction... .and... .what I thought was something I had done and asked that we go to counseling to try and improve and find a way to not let these negative interactions damage our relationship... .which she refused and would not go.

He indicated that some of the traits that we all have exhibited with our current spouse that we divorce or are divorcing that is personality disordered... .in fact enables the damage the relationship does to us and... .and he pointed out... .most of the time past behavior that we exhibited showed evidence that we can point out to some degree in previous relationships.

So... .be care... .I know you feel for sure... .at a 99.9% level... .but that .1% can be high risk since at the time you bonded with you ex-husband, I'm sure you felt 100% before you married that this was the right person for you for life.

Just passing on what my T reminds me about... .when the topic ever get to the subject of what about new relationships... .and points out that as far as personality disordered partners, repetition is not the key to learning and that repeating a relationship with someone who has traits like your ex... .is NOT AN OPTION!

Thanks for being so concerned 

Your T and my T talk the same language. I pretty much had to get her approval before I started dating again -- it took me 2 years post-divorce to even be remotely sure I was ready. And I wasn't looking -- he just happened.

How do you know someone doesn't have a PD? I don't think you do. They fool therapists, so they can fool us too. The only thing you can do is know what your feelings are, know what your boundaries are, and assert them. Also study them carefully around their friends and family, which I've been able to do.

It isn't just the PD behaviors that I'm looking for, it's any old boundary busting behavior.

There aren't a lot of good things about divorcing a pwBPD, but growing a backbone is definitely one of the silver linings. Maybe that's what you win in a BPD divorce. Yourself.



Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: NewWays on October 29, 2013, 01:57:52 PM
Lived n Learned... .

Your wisdom is awesome!  Do not mean to sound over concerned... .but as you point out... ."There are not a lot of good things about divorcing a person with NPD or BPD... .but growing a backbone is definately one of the silver linings"... .my T serves up a three bucket equation as it relates to this area... .He says... ."Awarness preceeds Backbone and Action"... .or Awarness + Backbone = Action.

I had little awarness or understanding of what PDs were when we got married, let alone some of what are unhealthy relationship interactions.  Heck... .I never even for one second knew that something as common as the "Silent Treatment" is a passive-aggressive form of emotional abuse!  When my wife would exhibit displeasure, disapproval, reprimanding and contempt via nov-verbal gestures... .but not talk to me for weeks at a time, I just thought she was being herself... .and/or incorrectly applied the stereo type as an excuse of her actions.

With the awarness you have gained and the careful study you conduct with family and friends, do you feel you now can readily identify those persons that are personalty disordered?

I'b be interested in your thoughts.

NewWays


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: maxen on October 29, 2013, 02:33:58 PM
reading this entire thread has been an education, and l-and-l praise to you for dealing with such a weirdo (if i may) and maintaining your humor.

There have been so many hard parts along the way. But when I found myself cast as villain with no reasonable explanation why, and no possible way to redeem myself... .I just couldn't believe it. I still can't believe it. Being split black was one of the most psychologically shocking and awful things I had experienced. It took a long time to realize that it was traumatizing because it was crazy. The reason you can't repair the relationship isn't because you failed. It's because your partner was crazy. And crazy, the way I experienced it, was discovering that N/BPDx lacked empathy.

all of this has also been part of my experience. my BPDstbxw's callousness has been a revelation. it's just deranging.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on November 01, 2013, 08:44:56 PM
With the awarness you have gained and the careful study you conduct with family and friends, do you feel you now can readily identify those persons that are personalty disordered?

I'b be interested in your thoughts.

NewWays

For a while, it seemed like my new hobby was to dx everyone with a PD. We can be too armored up, I think. But it also seems like an important stage to go through -- being hyper vigilant.

I think the main thing difference now is that if someone treats me badly, I know it's "Hello boundary, buh bye crazy pants." It's the behavior I won't allow in my life, not just the disorder.

And I'm also very vigilant about run-of-the-mill unhealthy behaviors. Like new guy -- I was driving his car while we were on our trip. He was giving me directions (good), but then he started to explain to me how to go around a round-about (yield to cars already in the circle, duh). I could've A) ignored it or seethed quietly. B) made a sarcastic comment like "thanks dad" or C) later pointed it out in a way that let him see his behavior while asserting my own boundary. I did C -- "I think when you feel out of sorts, you focus on me instead of you. How come?" Then I explained what he did, and why I thought he did it, and how it made me feel. Super ninja gentle stuff -- he just melted like putty.  *)

Made us feel closer that I could say it, he didn't feel criticized, and now he knows I'm onto him.

So now my new hobby is dx'ing everyone codependent.  :)





Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: momtara on November 07, 2013, 12:30:08 AM
Ha ha!  You are smart.  How did you meet the new guy?  Do you keep this info from your ex?

You set a good example.  I'm sorry that the PD has affected you for life, but it seems like it has taught you some good coping and relationship skills, anyway.

And... .I know I'm codependent.  So your dx wouldn't be wrong if you were talking to me!


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: coffee shop on November 07, 2013, 07:53:50 AM
Lived you are smart, not sure I would say it in a way that wouldn't sound flip. I will just have to keep reading more on the subject.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on November 07, 2013, 10:30:24 AM
Ha ha!  You are smart.  How did you meet the new guy?  Do you keep this info from your ex?

You set a good example.  I'm sorry that the PD has affected you for life, but it seems like it has taught you some good coping and relationship skills, anyway.

And... .I know I'm codependent.  So your dx wouldn't be wrong if you were talking to me!

I think figuring out the codependent behavior was my gigantic leap forward. Maybe that's the winning -- focusing on myself instead of other people. I still try to control other people, but at least I know there's an alternative, and the alternative (focusing on me) is the only thing that seems to work. Even though it's not always comfortable.

I met new guy walking dogs in our neighborhood. N/BPDx doesn't know about him, to my knowledge. Although S12 does know, so maybe it's just a matter of time. S12 doesn't know new guy's last name, and I plan to keep it that way as long as I can so new guy doesn't come under fire. I've read too many stories here that make me nervous about PD reactions.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on November 09, 2013, 09:53:37 AM
Winning is never winning.

There is no winning.

I took my Conclusions of Law from the last hearing, to show DMV that the judge said I could have the title to my car. DMV sent me through a meat grinder. I forgot about normal irritating things like the DMV because I've been dealing with bigger aggravations. But guys, DMV is like the junior version of family court.

They wanted a notarized signed copy of the Conclusions of Law. What the heck. Like the official stamp that shows the filing, and the presiding judge's signature isn't enough? Gah.

Also, I have to have an amendment that includes the VIN number of my vehicle in the Conclusions of Law, and a sentence that says the judge instructs DMV to permit transfer of title from defendant to plaintiff, VIN # blah blah blah.

The guy at DMV kept saying, "Can't you just get your ex husband to sign over the title?"

DMV guy, you clearly have no pwBPD in your life.

So what should I do? Pay my lawyer to redraft the Conclusions of Law and get the new language entered, and then have the judge sign it AGAIN?

Or do I write to N/BPDx and say, "You signed your car over to me." He is going to be ashamed that he made a mistake, and the spray of embarrassment from that interaction is going to be directed at me. If indeed it was a mistake. And then it opens up the issue about the title to his car, and how he now needs to get a duplicate one because he and my lawyer have signed his title to his car, basically ruining it.

Meanwhile, I'm about to sign the quit claim deed to my house, since it appears he has refinanced it. Since my lawyer didn't catch the fact that N/BPDx gave her the wrong title, I'm doubting whether she understands how this stuff goes. I have a letter from the title company saying that they will not record the QCD until the new financing has been recorded.

Do I really just sign a QCD, then send it in the mail, and hope things are ok? It doesn't seem right.



Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: ForeverDad on November 09, 2013, 11:58:33 AM
You quit claim deed is just about your only leverage.  No, don't let it leave your control until he new mortgage is recorded.  If you hand it over, then you have no way to pressure him now or later to do it.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on November 09, 2013, 12:03:38 PM
You quit claim deed is just about your only leverage.  No, don't let it leave your control until he new mortgage is recorded.  If you hand it over, then you have no way to pressure him now or later to do it.

The woman from the title company wrote a letter saying she would not file the QCD until the new mortgage is recorded -- that's what the real estate attorney seemed to think was all that was needed. But is the letter really enough? Shouldn't I see that the mortgage has been recorded first? Surely there must be a document I need to sign?


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: PrettyPlease on November 10, 2013, 11:38:00 PM
It always seems like a comedy of errors with pwBPD, except it's not funny!

Exactly exactly. I remember thinking, while with now-ex pwBPD, that we could only survive like this in a rich century, with so much inaccuracy, denial, and confusion in our relationship. If we were living hand-to-mouth and there were tigers in the tall grass we'd be dead in an hour.   

PP


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: Free One on November 11, 2013, 05:47:22 PM
Winning is never winning.

There is no winning.

I took my Conclusions of Law from the last hearing, to show DMV that the judge said I could have the title to my car. DMV sent me through a meat grinder. I forgot about normal irritating things like the DMV because I've been dealing with bigger aggravations. But guys, DMV is like the junior version of family court.

They wanted a notarized signed copy of the Conclusions of Law. What the heck. Like the official stamp that shows the filing, and the presiding judge's signature isn't enough? Gah.

Also, I have to have an amendment that includes the VIN number of my vehicle in the Conclusions of Law, and a sentence that says the judge instructs DMV to permit transfer of title from defendant to plaintiff, VIN # blah blah blah.

The guy at DMV kept saying, "Can't you just get your ex husband to sign over the title?"

DMV guy, you clearly have no pwBPD in your life.

So what should I do? Pay my lawyer to redraft the Conclusions of Law and get the new language entered, and then have the judge sign it AGAIN?

Or do I write to N/BPDx and say, "You signed your car over to me." He is going to be ashamed that he made a mistake, and the spray of embarrassment from that interaction is going to be directed at me. If indeed it was a mistake. And then it opens up the issue about the title to his car, and how he now needs to get a duplicate one because he and my lawyer have signed his title to his car, basically ruining it.

Meanwhile, I'm about to sign the quit claim deed to my house, since it appears he has refinanced it. Since my lawyer didn't catch the fact that N/BPDx gave her the wrong title, I'm doubting whether she understands how this stuff goes. I have a letter from the title company saying that they will not record the QCD until the new financing has been recorded.

Do I really just sign a QCD, then send it in the mail, and hope things are ok? It doesn't seem right.

Try again on a different day with same order different employee. Lay the sweetness on thick, "This has really been a bear for me to get taken care of. I have a signed order, but I've still been here a few times without resolution, but I KNOW you will be able to help me."  :)


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on November 11, 2013, 06:25:44 PM
Winning is never winning.

There is no winning.

I took my Conclusions of Law from the last hearing, to show DMV that the judge said I could have the title to my car. DMV sent me through a meat grinder. I forgot about normal irritating things like the DMV because I've been dealing with bigger aggravations. But guys, DMV is like the junior version of family court.

They wanted a notarized signed copy of the Conclusions of Law. What the heck. Like the official stamp that shows the filing, and the presiding judge's signature isn't enough? Gah.

Also, I have to have an amendment that includes the VIN number of my vehicle in the Conclusions of Law, and a sentence that says the judge instructs DMV to permit transfer of title from defendant to plaintiff, VIN # blah blah blah.

The guy at DMV kept saying, "Can't you just get your ex husband to sign over the title?"

DMV guy, you clearly have no pwBPD in your life.

So what should I do? Pay my lawyer to redraft the Conclusions of Law and get the new language entered, and then have the judge sign it AGAIN?

Or do I write to N/BPDx and say, "You signed your car over to me." He is going to be ashamed that he made a mistake, and the spray of embarrassment from that interaction is going to be directed at me. If indeed it was a mistake. And then it opens up the issue about the title to his car, and how he now needs to get a duplicate one because he and my lawyer have signed his title to his car, basically ruining it.

Meanwhile, I'm about to sign the quit claim deed to my house, since it appears he has refinanced it. Since my lawyer didn't catch the fact that N/BPDx gave her the wrong title, I'm doubting whether she understands how this stuff goes. I have a letter from the title company saying that they will not record the QCD until the new financing has been recorded.

Do I really just sign a QCD, then send it in the mail, and hope things are ok? It doesn't seem right.

Try again on a different day with same order different employee. Lay the sweetness on thick, "This has really been a bear for me to get taken care of. I have a signed order, but I've still been here a few times without resolution, but I KNOW you will be able to help me."  :)

I wrote my L asking her if she can amend the Conclusions of Law so that it specifically mentions the VIN number and addresses the DMV, giving them permission to transfer title. It's times like this that make me realize how seriously crazy BPD is. That I have to do this instead of asking him to send me the title.

Sometimes this stuff makes me just plain angry. Usually I suck it up because that's what I was trained to do. Now I feel p!ssed.

The house stuff: I wrote the real estate attorney and my attorney and said, Really? Don't I need to see the new mortgage has been recorded? This is N/BPDx here. And my L, well -- clearly details are not her strong point. Winning custody, yes. Looking carefully at car titles? No. So I'm asking the real estate attorney to bring his full detail-oriented self to the matter.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: ForeverDad on November 11, 2013, 10:29:40 PM
Sounds like ex is a walking and talking Murphy.  If it can go wrong, he will make sure it does go wrong.


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on November 13, 2013, 11:55:31 AM
Back. In. Court. Again. Today.

Please send me a desk to bang my head against. Mine has a dent in it from prior head banging.

Today, we went to court because N/BPDx had a Motion to Compel Discovery. The discovery was about 25 pages long. With emails attached, it was about 50. N/BPDx wanted me to admit or deny all kinds of bizarre things. By bizarre, I mean bizarre. Admit I did this, deny I did that. Including my favorite: Admit that I did not deny the affair(s).

He filed this back in the spring. We filed an extension. Then, in the meantime, we had a hearing that determined I was to be awarded full custody. N/BPDx stuck to his right to have his motion heard. Thing is, we had the hearing. Why does he need discovery for a hearing that has passed? Because he's BPD.

So we listened to him make an argument to get me to produce discovery items so he could... .argue that the conclusions of law made by this same judge were somehow not sound. N/BPDx is a lawyer. Anyone out there divorcing a lawyer -- let it be known that you have nothing to fear. The BPD cancels out the legal expertise. Entirely.

Next, we go back to court in December. If he hasn't paid me legal fees by that time, either A) he goes to jail right then and there. Or B) he has until noon the next day to pay. If he doesn't have it, he reports to jail.

That's only for the legal fees from the first hearing though. I'll have to file a motion for contempt to get him to pay legal fees from the last motion for contempt.

If it didn't cost so much money, I might see the humor in this. Instead, it's just making me so mad. Sorry to anyone on these boards if I'm sounding more and more blunt in response to your posts, but I'm so angry about this now. I'm fed up with BPD.



Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: whirlpoollife on November 13, 2013, 05:12:48 PM
Lnl  wow . No advice but  .


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: Free One on November 14, 2013, 06:58:36 PM
Sorry to anyone on these boards if I'm sounding more and more blunt in response to your posts, but I'm so angry about this now. I'm fed up with BPD.

I would be too!


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: Free One on November 14, 2013, 07:03:40 PM
During my divorce, I had to file a quit claim deed for my ex to refinance. It was explained to me that I had to sign the QCD BEFORE the bank would fund the loan. I was nervous about this, but my lawyer added some wording in some temp agreement that ex would have to quit claim back to me if he was unable to refinance (he had no job at the time). Well, somehow he did it - but in the process HE had filled out the QCD deed wrong and it was invalid. No one ever said anything, and I didn't remedy it for about a year after the divorce (when I had business at the assessor's office anyway).


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on November 14, 2013, 08:22:34 PM
I just let my neurotic side run free here -- decided to call everyone, get things in email, emailed the real estate attorney, and my other attorney, and just kept saying: No mistakes here people. It's ok to make mistakes, but not with this account. You over there closing on this, explain xyz. You with the mortgage company, I need a notice saying I am no longer liable for the home equity. Real estate attorney, help me out here.

That kind of thing. The jumping up and down banging tables kind of thing, except through email.

Felt good.

Real estate attorney called everyone, was very diligent, explained the whole process to me, and said I think this thing is solid. We got a letter from the home equity company releasing me from legal liability, and a letter saying they would record things in the correct order, and everyone seems to understand nothing wrong can happen here.

Because if it did, it means going back to court to fix it. And people, I am done with court. Once this refi is done and the title is in my name only, and N/BPDx pays me legal fees, and and and. Well, I guess I'm not done with court... .

But you know what I mean. I don't want to be back in court because someone didn't fill out a document correctly.

Honestly, I think that would break me.



Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: Free One on November 15, 2013, 06:26:00 PM
Good for you. You took action and you did what you good to resolve the situation. Now it's out of your hands and we'll hope for the best!


Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: whirlpoollife on November 17, 2013, 08:27:24 AM
A quote from the book, ":)ivorcing a Narcissit , One Moms Battle" by Tina Swithin.

""You may have to fight a battle more than once to win it. - Margaret Thatcher""



Title: Re: not sure what winning means anymore
Post by: livednlearned on November 17, 2013, 09:20:14 AM
A quote from the book, ":)ivorcing a Narcissit , One Moms Battle" by Tina Swithin.

""You may have to fight a battle more than once to win it. - Margaret Thatcher""

That is so true. That quote speaks volumes. Thanks wplife.