This time last week after a particularly bad episode, I was pretty sure I needed to end this relationship. After a few days of thinking, I was 99% sure I wanted to work harder about making it work. But now I am back to being on the fence, or at least on the fence about being on the fence.
FD- you just found what I experienced as a "flip" in my father's thinking. At one moment he seemed aware of the issues with my BPD mother and then, it was as if nothing happened. It also seemed to parallel my BPD mother's way of suddenly erasing in her mind what had just happened and she was "acting good now" at least for the moment. I saw this happen many times. During the times BPD mother appeared relatively "good"- it's as if he somehow was in a state of forgetfulness. It was this dual mindset that seemed to keep them in this relationship pattern.
The status quo seemed to be this. BPD mother had her behaviors, and Dad's response was enabling/compliance. While at times it seemed things might have gotten so difficult he might consider divorce- the situation might settle and then, it was as if whatever happened didn't happen.
But we kids did see what happened and it seemed that no matter what my BPD mother did- it didn't change this pattern. We talk about boundaries here but boundaries are the bottom line for us- what would we act on. What are actions we don't ignore or go along with? I don't wish to post all the behaviors we either witnessed or experienced, but some were similar to what Max has posted about and yet, each time, there was this "flip" in his thinking and actions. If there's nothing that prompts taking action, then these are not boundaries.
I also agree with CC43's post about how enabling fosters a perpetual dependency, and how not having boundaries or consequences or responsibilities perpetuates a child-like existence and mindset. How this happens seems to be a chicken-egg question. Was this enabling an adaptation to BPD mother's disability or did it keep her that way? And why did my father enable? I don't know. I think one thing was that it gave him a momentary reprieve from her behavior, and when BPD mother was escalating, in the moment, one wanted relief.
I think people balk at the term co-dependency because, they aren't the dependent ones in the traditional sense. Dad was the wage earner, the more emotionally stable one. I also am an independent type person- so when a counselor brought up co-dependency with me, it didn't make sense but I took her advice and went along with it. Eventually I understood more about the concept and why she made that recommendation.
FD mentioned family of origin and this can be where this starts, because these traits are seen as positive in the FOO and also in general- caring, compassionate, able to tolerate a lot. These were the "normal" in my family and they aren't bad traits in general. It's when they are done to the extreme, and perpetuate dysfunction, that they are considered co-dependent.
We may not see our own co-dependent behaviors as problematic if they were the "normal" in our FOO. Or they may be an adaptation to the dynamics in a relationship with a person who has a disorder.
In general, people don't take action to change unless a situation becomes so intollerable they see change as the only option. If someone is being enabled and doesn't experience consequences of hurtful behavior- there's not motivation to change. Same for the person who is in the enabling position. Perhaps it's a difficult situation but is it difficult enough to take action?


