Home page of BPDFamily.com, online relationship supportMember registration here
December 26, 2024, 09:59:17 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Board Admins: Kells76, Once Removed, Turkish
Senior Ambassadors: EyesUp, SinisterComplex
  Help!   Boards   Please Donate Login to Post New?--Click here to register  
bing
How to communicate after a contentious divorce... Following a contentious divorce and custody battle, there are often high emotion and tensions between the parents. Research shows that constant and chronic conflict between the parents negatively impacts the children. The children sense their parents anxiety in their voice, their body language and their parents behavior. Here are some suggestions from Dean Stacer on how to avoid conflict.
84
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Ex claiming daycare expenses on non-court ordered CS  (Read 479 times)
JNChell
a.k.a. "WTL"
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Relationship status: Dissolved
Posts: 3520



« on: January 25, 2019, 05:17:24 PM »

Hello. It looks like S4’s mom is going to claim the CS that I gave her which supposedly paid for daycare on her taxes. She has since refused any further CS. She now has DC assistance through the state. My question is, since this money wasn’t court ordered, can this money be seen as a gift? The checks that I wrote her listed CS on the memo line.

There was a generic receipt (from one of those booklets that you can buy at Staples) that list when the “cash” payments started to when they stopped. There are discrepancies here. My payments to S4’s mom go beyond the final payment listed on the receipt, and start before the first payment on the receipt. I’m assuming that since I wrote CS on the memo line instead of DC that this is null and void. Still, I’d appreciate any feedback.
Logged

“Adversity can destroy you, or become your best seller.”
-a new friend
ForeverDad
Retired Staff
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Relationship status: separated 2005 then divorced
Posts: 18517


You can't reason with the Voice of Unreason...


« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2019, 03:26:46 PM »

I could jump in with all sorts of angles and statements (I'm not sure what DC is?) but it just boils down to... .

If you're divorced (or not married and relationship ended), she's doing her taxes separate from yours and it won't impact your own tax paperwork then... .it's her decision how she declares items on her taxes.  If IRS contests, well, they'll be reaching out to her most likely.  She's an adult, it's her consequences.  If IRS reaches out to you, then state your position and provide your appropriate docs.

Starting this year any child support (CS) orders will continue the tax liability of the payer.  The big change is with alimony, starting with 2019 any new or revised alimony orders are the payer's tax responsibility too.  In years past the recipient had to list alimony.  Everyone loved it that way since usually the payer had higher income and the recipient often had minimal income, so the tax man got less.  The govt got smart and changed the rules starting Jan 1 for new or revised alimony orders.
Logged

Sandb2015
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Romantic partner
Relationship status: Living apart, kicked out on 12/19 after meeting 3/19/2015
Posts: 459


« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2019, 03:45:05 PM »

Hey JNChell,

The state you are in may help.

Are you saying the CS is NOT court ordered?  If not, it is not a gift especially if she is declaring it as income. 

What is DC?

I'm in NY, It matters what she is declaring.  What you wrote on the check or received a receipt for is relevant, it shows money only changed hands. 

Logged

Just because you think it, doesn't make it true.
JNChell
a.k.a. "WTL"
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Relationship status: Dissolved
Posts: 3520



« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2019, 05:23:18 PM »

DC is daycare. Sorry, I assumed it was on the list of abbreviations. I should’ve looked first. From what I see, she’s not listing it as income. She cashed my checks, paid cash and is listing it as an expense.
Logged

“Adversity can destroy you, or become your best seller.”
-a new friend
JNChell
a.k.a. "WTL"
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Relationship status: Dissolved
Posts: 3520



« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2019, 05:33:45 PM »

I should also point out that we were never married. Also, that when she requested CS during the breakup, she said it was just that. CS. Just before she denied “CS”, and added another state benefit to her list of many (state daycare assistance), she stated that I had been paying for daycare only. Now she’s claiming the money that I paid (on her return) as if she had paid it in cash? I’m not interested in pursuing it if I even can. I simply want to be able to see this crap coming in the future.

There are subjects on this board that are very pressing. Much more so than mine. I appreciate the feedback.
Logged

“Adversity can destroy you, or become your best seller.”
-a new friend
Can You Help Us Stay on the Air in 2024?

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Our 2023 Financial Sponsors
We are all appreciative of the members who provide the funding to keep BPDFamily on the air.
12years
alterK
AskingWhy
At Bay
Cat Familiar
CoherentMoose
drained1996
EZEarache
Flora and Fauna
ForeverDad
Gemsforeyes
Goldcrest
Harri
healthfreedom4s
hope2727
khibomsis
Lemon Squeezy
Memorial Donation (4)
Methos
Methuen
Mommydoc
Mutt
P.F.Change
Penumbra66
Red22
Rev
SamwizeGamgee
Skip
Swimmy55
Tartan Pants
Turkish
whirlpoollife



Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2020, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!