"Even if you are secure, you may learn a few new tricks [to increase] your overall satisfaction level in relationships."Practical reading. Users that are dating will benefit. Users out of the relationship with a pwBPD will find additional support for their decision through Levine and Heller's lens of attachment styles.
More benefits to reading are summarised on the authors' justification for one example in-text:
We've included it for three reasons: to illustrate the power of the attachment process, to show that even emotionally healthy individuals can become entangled in a destructive situation, and to let people in those relationships know that they can find a better life for themselves if they muster the strength to leave.
It adds perspective that behaviours neither have to be "the BPD" nor have serious pathological roots.
Some good takeaways:
- Habits of secure-styled people.
- "Spotting 'smoking guns' very early on an treating them as deal breakers."
- Effective communication as a way to tell more in five minutes with a person than a few months.
Review.A relatively low time investment--lighter reading than Lawson's
Understanding the Borderline Mother [... .] (2010). I liked the accessible voice.
BPD issues are deeply rooted within the pwBPD. Correspondingly, that "people gravitate toward their emotional mirror images [in mate selection]" (Kerr and Bowen's
Family Evaluation (1988), implies that one has to dig deep on the SO side too--to recognise what's on their side of the psychological mirror. Here, Levine and Heller give a nice take on issues that feel lighter because work to find effective solutions for oneself don't seem to require a long dive (e.g., FOO or subconscious fantasies).
The examples on style recognition and conflict resolution seem realistic and practical.
Reading the effective communication portion will probably be validating for readers of Lawson's work and Fruzzetti's
The High-Conflict Couple [... .] (2006).
In a BPD management context, I didn't agree with some of Levine and Heller's suggestions. For example (p.249(2010):
George is instinctively able to contain Kelly's personal attack and, taking responsibility for her hurt feelings, turns the situation around while remaining engaged.
With an SO managing a BPD, I think it's possible to do none of 'containing' the attack, taking responsibility for someone else's feelings, and turning the situation around--yet still be engaged. Those three particular suggestions may be destructive; e.g., containing/internalising a pwBPD's attack. Instead you may validate, you may empathise, you may then move forward into the issue-resolution-cum-date that George does later.
Of movements like codependency and differentiation (p.26(2010), I agree with the authors' point to choose discriminately among them and apply it to your relationships.
Of course this isn't a BPD-specific book. If you're involved in the management of a BPD in your life, I highly recommend a qualified therapist, and Mason and Kreger's
Stop Walking on Eggshells [... .] (2010). If you want an encouraging read related to inventorying yourself post-relationship then Fjelstad's
Stop Caretaking the Borderline or Narcissist [... .] (2013) is excellent.
I recommend this book as a good segue for people to move from a traumatic dating scene to a one with less trauma.
Further Discussion.Re identifying someone as a particular attachment style and combining it with BPD elements; attachment styles (per the authors) are a set of three general terms to categorise behaviours--whereas BPD is a serious mental illness.
For SOs, I advise that if these tools are cutting edge--then use the right knife. For example I use Fruzzetti's discussion preparation technique sometimes for a wide range of situations (lower arousal, stay mindful of self, etc.), but I'd never use the suggestion to "[w]ear your heart on your sleeve" (p.235(2010) with an individual I think has BPD. Of course, I use honesty often with people I've already screened-in. The other four points in that list are excellent.
Poll
