Home page of BPDFamily.com, online relationship supportMember registration here
April 19, 2025, 12:55:51 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Board Admins: Kells76, Once Removed, Turkish
Senior Ambassadors: EyesUp, SinisterComplex
  Help!   Boards   Please Donate Login to Post New?--Click here to register  
bing
Experts share their discoveries [video]
100
Caretaking - What is it all about?
Margalis Fjelstad, PhD
Blame - why we do it?
Brené Brown, PhD
Family dynamics matter.
Alan Fruzzetti, PhD
A perspective on BPD
Ivan Spielberg, PhD
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: advice on refuting a move away custody evaluation in California?  (Read 539 times)
calidad
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 118


« on: February 09, 2016, 04:17:23 PM »

My ex uNPD/PBD tried to relocate the kids without my permission last year and move them 90 miles away. Under threat of having the police called she stopped and filed for a move-away. Her father is wealthy so he wrote her a blank check.

She lied up and down to the custody evaluator while I told the truth. I got the sense he was biased as he was really condescending and almost hostile towards me in our interviews. I volunteer in the school and work from home while my ex works 11 hour days (the kids are only awake 12!).

In any case, he bought into her bull___ and has recommended that they go with her under the assumption that she moves. He ignored a number of major facts including that she is keeping her apartment here and has already stated she will not move if the judge rules against her. He also refused to interview several of my witnesses who could confirm most of the facts.

So my question is this - the evaluation and the law in California states that the court should make a determination assuming the person is moving. However, in this case she has already said she doesn't need to and won't move if the court rules against her.

Has anyone had a similar case? I'm looking to determine if I can use that angle - that the custody evaluation is not only biased, but irrelevant since she's said she's not moving without the kids.

Any other words of wisdom?
Logged
ForeverDad
Retired Staff
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Relationship status: separated 2005 then divorced
Posts: 18676


You can't reason with the Voice of Unreason...


« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2016, 09:21:38 AM »

If I wanted to move and it had to be decided by court or CE and the outcome wasn't in my favor, I too might reconsider moving and even cancel it.  So for that aspect I wonder whether you're overly focused on what may not mean much.

I would consider that you working from home versus her away working 11 hours a day as a factor that may mean more than her iffiness on moving.  By itself it may not succeed since mothers often get unwritten default preference.  The court or evaluation could just hide behind the opinion "she has been majority time parent so insufficient reason to change it."

What percentage of time do you have in the schedule?  Who is Residential Parent for School Purposes?  Do you have any other reasons to keep the kids local?
Logged

Can You Help Us Stay on the Air in 2024?

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Our 2023 Financial Sponsors
We are all appreciative of the members who provide the funding to keep BPDFamily on the air.
12years
alterK
AskingWhy
At Bay
Cat Familiar
CoherentMoose
drained1996
EZEarache
Flora and Fauna
ForeverDad
Gemsforeyes
Goldcrest
Harri
healthfreedom4s
hope2727
khibomsis
Lemon Squeezy
Memorial Donation (4)
Methos
Methuen
Mommydoc
Mutt
P.F.Change
Penumbra66
Red22
Rev
SamwizeGamgee
Skip
Swimmy55
Tartan Pants
Turkish
whirlpoollife



Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2020, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!