Home page of BPDFamily.com, online relationship supportMember registration here
December 26, 2024, 09:12:49 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Board Admins: Kells76, Once Removed, Turkish
Senior Ambassadors: EyesUp, SinisterComplex
  Help!   Boards   Please Donate Login to Post New?--Click here to register  
bing
How to communicate after a contentious divorce... Following a contentious divorce and custody battle, there are often high emotion and tensions between the parents. Research shows that constant and chronic conflict between the parents negatively impacts the children. The children sense their parents anxiety in their voice, their body language and their parents behavior. Here are some suggestions from Dean Stacer on how to avoid conflict.
84
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Is a substantial fear of abandonment unique to BPD?  (Read 456 times)
Rainfoster

Offline Offline

What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Posts: 6


« on: January 30, 2019, 08:07:12 PM »

Is a substantial fear of abandonment unique to BPD?
Are there any other conditions that have fear of abandonment to the level found in BPD?
Should anyone with a substantial fear of abandonment get checked out for BPD?
(obviously it is threshold dependent - I'm talking about the fear of abandonment to the level as described in BPD which produces many counter-productive behaviours)   
Logged
livednlearned
Retired Staff
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Family other
Relationship status: Married
Posts: 12866



« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2019, 11:14:27 AM »

It likely won't matter to the court whether she's BPD or not, or something else that exhibits a fear of abandonment because courts don't like to stigmatize mental illness, especially in family law. If it appears you are weaponizing mental illness be prepared for a good scolding. Same goes for substance abuse. You get many, many bites at the apple in family law court -- focus more on establishing patterns of behaviors that negatively impact the kids. 

Even if you had a professional dx, you still need an expert witness to explain to the court how BPD or any other mental illness negatively impacts the kids.
Logged

Breathe.
Sandb2015
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Romantic partner
Relationship status: Living apart, kicked out on 12/19 after meeting 3/19/2015
Posts: 459


« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2019, 11:24:25 AM »

Short of a forensic makeup on both parents ordered by the court, very expensive, very intrusive and time consuming, everything else will be considered name calling and frowned upon.
Logged

Just because you think it, doesn't make it true.
ForeverDad
Retired Staff
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Relationship status: separated 2005 then divorced
Posts: 18516


You can't reason with the Voice of Unreason...


« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2019, 01:51:25 AM »

As already noted, a lot of claims are made during a divorce, especially a high conflict one, and courts generally ignore it all unless there are 'substantive' concerns such as child abuse, neglect or endangerment.

A psych eval may identify a PD (personality disorder) but doesn't give a clear indication how parenting or children are impacted.  However, a custody evaluation conducted by a reputable and experienced expert — a lousy evaluation can result in a disastrous evaluation report — is intended to dig deeper into the family dynamic, the parents, the children and what would be recommended to the court for custody and parenting schedules.

Be forewarned that a CE will take months, perhaps a year or more.  And they're not cheap.  Mine was 5 months and nearly $4K.  Fast and quite inexpensive compared to others' experiences.  I had a highly recommended child psychologist.  I only saw the preliminary report but it was solid.  We didn't use the final report but having it helped avoid an even more expensive trial.  (All the professionals were hoping for a settlement.  Having the report looming for court was incentive for my entitled ex to finally negotiate a decent settlement.)

In my case my ex's lawyer agreed to my lawyer's suggested evaluator.  You may have to be strategically smart in ensuring you get a solid evaluator.  Courts generally like both parents to participate in the selection.  One approach that generally works is that we (the proactive reasonable parents) do research and find a few of the better evaluators and then present that most excellent short list to the other side to make the final pick.  Court ought to see that as fair.  The point is you have to proactively narrow the options so the other side can't slip in biased or inept evaluators.  (By the way, this approach often works well too when trying to get good counselors for the children.)
Logged

Can You Help Us Stay on the Air in 2024?

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Our 2023 Financial Sponsors
We are all appreciative of the members who provide the funding to keep BPDFamily on the air.
12years
alterK
AskingWhy
At Bay
Cat Familiar
CoherentMoose
drained1996
EZEarache
Flora and Fauna
ForeverDad
Gemsforeyes
Goldcrest
Harri
healthfreedom4s
hope2727
khibomsis
Lemon Squeezy
Memorial Donation (4)
Methos
Methuen
Mommydoc
Mutt
P.F.Change
Penumbra66
Red22
Rev
SamwizeGamgee
Skip
Swimmy55
Tartan Pants
Turkish
whirlpoollife



Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2020, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!