Not sure if this makes sense to me yet. Does it make better sense to you now?
Here's the way I see it LF. I'm going to borrow Astro's seesaw analogy.
You have 3 fundamental states of being, all revolving around your core pain. Each end of the seesaw represents the extreme states of your core pain.
One end is when your core pain is buried into your subconscious. It is there impacting every aspect of your life and you have no control over it because you can't see it.
The other end is when your core pain is on the surface. In this state you do see it but you still have no control over it.
At each extreme end your core pain is in control.
In the center is where you find the balance between the two states. This is where you see the core pain but are in control of it. You recognize it for what it is and you don't let it impact your life in a negative fashion. This is where you are when engaged in healthy activities and positive thinking. Let's say a state of acceptance of your core pain.
When you are with your exBP your core pain is at the surface. It is controlling you, but at times you find some "relief" because you ex puts a blind fold on you. You can't see you are at the extreme end of the seesaw. Eventually the blindfold falls off and you realize where you are. This is when you split.
I will speculate that much of your life you have been at the other extreme end, where your core pain has been buried in your subconscious. This is where you are most "comfortable" because it is where you have spent the most time. That said, it is just a destructive as the other extreme end of the seesaw, the one when you are with exBP.
Now that you are aware of your core pain you can find a way to the middle of the seesaw, sometimes pausing in-between the middle and the two extreme states. When you find yourself in that limbo between one end in the middle is where you feel uncertain of which direction to take, where to find the balance.
Does that make sense?