Against all odds, the judge went from supervised visitation to 24h-week-ends and then to extended week-ends for my S3 (from Friday after school to Monday morning), which not only is very long (this means not being at home from Friday morning at school until Monday evening after school) but highly inconvenient as S3 will be going to school from september and SBD x lives 1h away.
Anyway, having no choice, and seeing the date for those long week-ends was approaching, I wrote a letter (I refuse to communicate by email as my ex then sends messages every day and this generates a lot of anxiety to me), and put it in S3's bag.
In it, I explained that S3 had to be picked up from and taken back to his nanny's, gave contact details and her working hours.
Always wanting to be in control of everything, I guess BPD was so anxious to get the upper hand back that he wrote a letter too, to say that the time and day didn't suit him.
So in the end, his
chauffeur girfriend will be picking my son from my house later on Fridays, and bringing him back on Sundays.
He concludes that if I don't agree,
what do I suggest - he'll send his requests to the judge for her agreement.
He thinks that getting everything he asked for when our son turns 3 makes him eligible for any future demands.
So, I wonder, to get what we want, should we ask for the opposite?
