The reality of female on male domestic violence.
Date: Nov-2007Minutes: 3:02 Domestic Violence - female on maleThere are two very interesting things about this video, how bone chilling it is to me as it is fairly identical to one of many incidents of DV in my relationship with my ex wife. But it is also interesting to watch the comments as people try to describe what the man in this video should've done, or would have been justified in doing.
This video is almost like someone put a video camera in my home one day in July of 2007.
I went directly to the PD to report the incident. They went to the house to arrest my then wife. She said I threw her on the floor so she got up and bit me. She was arrested for simple assault on me. I had a bite mark on my arm to substantiate that I was bitten, and she admitted to csuch in her statement, but in her statement said her bite was self defense after having been thrown to the ground. As a victim of DV, it is by law the process that the police explain I have a right ot request a restraining order, and I said I did want to request one.
Meanwhile, as they are writing up the report and the paperwork on the TRO, another officer is in getting my wife's version, and of course they intend to arrest me for simple assualt for pushing her. They ask her if she wants a restraining order, and she says no. But then they tell her I have asked for one, so now she is asking too.
This is explained to me, and the police explain the process is that a hearing will be held with teh municipal judge on teh phone, and I will be sworn in and heard. About an hour later I was presented with the TRO against me and told the police will escort me to the home to get personal items and then I must leave. There was no hearing, and I certainly wasn't heard. At the time, I did not know the law, but this was absolutely mishandled by the police and the municipal court judge under NJSA 2C:25-17 et seq. Thsi statue is New Jersey's Prevention of Domestic Violence Act, and this statute defines how law enforcment and municipal judges are supposed to handle this type of situation, and they way it was handled was directly contrary to how the state law says it should have been handled -- I should have been heard.
The next day I went to family court and I also won a TRO against her. What I did not do, which I now know I should've but didn't know at the time, was within 24 hrs of being served the TRO, I should have appealed it in family court while I was there getting the TRO. And the appeal would have been decided in my favor since the municipal court judge didn't hold a proper hearing before deciding.