Home page of BPDFamily.com, online relationship supportMember registration here
August 05, 2021, 10:37:54 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Board Admins: Harri, Once Removed
Senior Ambassadors: Cat Familiar, I Am Redeemed, Mutt, Turkish
  Help!   Boards   Please Donate Login to Post New?--Click here to register  
bing
Survey: How do you compare?
Adult Children Sensitivity
67% are highly sensitive
Romantic Break-ups
73% have five or more recycles
Physical Hitting
66% of members were hit
Depression Test
61% of members are moderate-severe
108
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: I somehow, without meaning to, have set "talking" as a line in the sand [Part 1]  (Read 7141 times)
patientandclear
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: single
Posts: 2785



« Reply #30 on: August 15, 2015, 07:51:03 AM »

Phoebe, that's such an interesting answer. I do think it applies here. But what does it suggest about what I should do now? The insistence on talking doesn't seem helpful. I really am fine with so much about how things go with him. I tried being open and not imposing a bunch of stingy feeling boundaries, with the intention of clarifying my quite limited needs in order to continue like that at some point so he's not confused. I get that he needs me to take care of myself and I was/am. But as a result--I think as a result of his assumptions or fears about where I was going with the "talk"--we're dead in the water now. And somehow i've become "the woman who wants to talk about the r/ship." Am I missing something about how to take care of myself that could avoid this impasse?
Logged
MaybeSo
Distinguished Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: Together five years, ended suddenly June 2011
Posts: 3680


Players only love you when they're playing...


« Reply #31 on: August 15, 2015, 05:35:44 PM »

Hi P&C!

First and foremost, I didn't read every single part of this thread, I have to admit. But I read most of it.

But, what you wrote above and any/all description of your time with him... .is what it is like to have him in your life.

THIS. Right now. Is what it's like to have him in your life.

This is what it's like.  So make sure you are choosing what IS, including what is happening right now... .which is NO accident... .and make sure you are not fooling yourself into thinking you are somehow going to get something different if you just find a way.

What you have experienced so far IS what it is like to have him in your life. All of it.


This is just my opinion, and you will have to take it as coming from a person who was in a similar situation, though more involved.  We did live together, co-parent etc. But the basic dynamics were the same as you continue to describe here.   And I'm out because I learned there was no real safety net to be found, and I looked in every corner and investigated every angle possible.  

There is the concept of being a 'lie invitee'.  My requirements were similar to yours, and certainly I had a bottom line regarding fidelity.

In requiring this multiple times, I turned into a lie invitee.  I invited a person who showed me time again that he simply was unable to stay put and keep a hold of himself in a committed relationship (not just with me)... .to lie to me about this and to make promises and agree to things... .I did so by using (fidelity) as the required currency to be in my life in the way he wanted (periodically) to be in it... .but he had already shown me over and over that he couldn't do this.  And yet I asked for it anyway.  He accepted.  He gained access for a while, then over time would of course grow disatisfied and then eventually he would dump me and move on.  

I listened to him agree to do things over and over that he had shown no capacity to do, and no pattern of having been able to do it, but i kept requiring it as the currency for access to me.  

And he wanted access to me so he at times said OKAY! and agreed to what I asked for.  

And of course, it never, ever,  held.  And of course, there's always a reason why... .usually having to do with something I did that disappointed him or some such thing... .you know... .relationship stuff.  

P&C, I would trust fully your person's pattern.

If his pattern is to leave, trust he will eventually leave (even if only temporarily).

If it is his pattern that he needs to have attention from a new source, trust he will do that, too.  

If he tells you he cannot be trusted... .BELIEVE HIM.

If your person continues to stay away from these waters... .it may be that he actually knows himself better and/or has perhaps more integrity ... .or is less desperate... .than the person I was involved with.  I don't know.

My person told me several times he was not to be trusted... .and I chose instead to believe the sweet things I wanted to hear  that would come out of his mouth at times... .when he was lonely or missing me or desperate for some access to me... .and past the first 1-2 go arounds... .I was fully engaging in being a 'lie invitee' when I would grant him access only after he told me stuff that both of us knew was not really sustainable.  

Come on now.  If a person has never had any success with long term commitment or fidelity... .they are going to continue to really struggle in that area.  No matter what.   It is questionable really if they even value it at all, or are they simply agreeing to what is needed for access?  

Even if it is sincere at the time... .it's going to be a problem.  You know this, right?  He isn't going to do 'fidelity' well just all of a sudden because you want it or ask for it.

I think you might still be trying to get around something here that can't be gotten around.

All the calculus in the world isn't going to change who he is, and who you are.

Why or why is it so hard to believe a person who tells us they can't be trusted?  


Logged

patientandclear
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: single
Posts: 2785



« Reply #32 on: August 15, 2015, 07:00:35 PM »

MS: extremely good questions and points as usual.

I guess what is keeping me engaged -- why I got back in touch with him, why I wanted to talk -- is that when he was explaining why he "can't be trusted," his explanation was that "no one can handle my reactions." But I think I can. And he has no idea that I think that, or might be right. And it seems such a shame to just give up, if that's true. He's assuming it's just futile.
Logged
formflier
Ambassador
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Romantic partner
Relationship status: Married
Posts: 18410



WWW
« Reply #33 on: August 15, 2015, 09:42:10 PM »

 

This is probably not something to "argue" about.

If you want to tell him you can "hack it"... .or "handle it"... .

Tell him once... and then drop it.

Otherwise... .I think it could be something you argue about... .a lot.

He has breakdown and flips out... .you stay calm... .he claims you are not calm... .you claim you are... .

It's sort of another thing to debate... .or go in circles on.

Depending on how deeply he holds this conviction that you can't handle it... .you run the risk of invalidating him by "proving" you can.

To be clear:  I think you are fine to discuss this with him one time... .say it... .drop it... .and move on.

FF
Logged

patientandclear
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: single
Posts: 2785



« Reply #34 on: August 15, 2015, 10:26:02 PM »

FF, that sounds right to me, and that's pretty much what I had in mind with the talk I proposed.  But he's not willing to talk.  And absent some sort of clarification that to me, the intimacy we engage in MEANS a committed, albeit unusual, r/ship, I don't think we should continue with the intimate connection.  And I didn't want to say that by email.  And he won't talk in person.  So ... .we're not communicating at all.  If I had had a chance to tell him what I meant to tell him, I think we could have carried on without him making any "concessions" or losing face in any way, but with a clearer understanding of what this means to me, and ... .we might have a good stretch without ever really defining what it "is."  Fine with me.  It just seems to me that we ended up off track because we got high-centered on this issue of "talking," and now I don't know how to get back on better ground.
Logged
apollotech
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Posts: 792


« Reply #35 on: August 15, 2015, 10:28:00 PM »

P&C,

Wow, this thread has me really confused. Correct me if I am wrong here:

You want to get him to the table to talk to let him know that you can handle his actions/behaviors. By so doing, you think that he'll see the light and enter into a committed, monogamous relationship; although, his prior actions/behaviors are not indicative of that (prior actions/behaviors which you are placing boundaries against)?

Also, I have seen this in some fashion or another posted twice by you on this thread:

... .he was explaining why he "can't be trusted," his explanation was that "no one can handle my reactions."

Is this ^^^^ what you're basing your conclusions on in regards to talking to him about being able to handle his actions/behaviors? You do see here that he is taking no responsibility for his "reactions?" The problem is not with him; it is with everyone else. Do you think that will change inside of a  committed, monogamous relationship?
Logged
patientandclear
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: single
Posts: 2785



« Reply #36 on: August 15, 2015, 10:37:51 PM »

Apollotech: no, I don't see him changing his reactions.  I spent a couple of years wondering if he was interested in doing that.  I now see he is not.  The question is whether, accepting he will have the reactions he has, I am prepared to deal with them.  I think so.  I have a pretty good understanding of his dynamics and cycles now and once I stopped taking it all personally, it doesn't bother me much.  He basically pulls away, gets grumpy ... .then repairs and resumes.  I'm fine with that.

And no -- I wanted to "get him to the table" to make sure he knows that I am NOT OK with continued intimate connection under a "friends" framework and/or if he wants to see other women.  He could conclude the contrary given that I had told him we'd have pretty superficial contact as long as those were his terms, and then he pushed hard for more intimacy, and I stopped resisting that.  Before I redoubled my commitment not to be intimate without a commitment, I wanted to be sure (as he's asked me to do before) that I was reading him right.

The issue of telling him that I can handle his reactions/behaviors ... .that is only coming up because several posts on this thread have asked me why I think things could change for us.  I think, someday, when we can really hear each other, this is something important for me to tell him.  That is NOT what I had in mind for the conversation he is presently declining to have.  I think he knew this talk was a "more than friends or less contact" talk and he doesn't feel like having that.
Logged
apollotech
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Posts: 792


« Reply #37 on: August 15, 2015, 11:29:25 PM »

I think he knew this talk was a "more than friends or less contact" talk and he doesn't feel like having that.

P&C,

Thank you for your response and clarification. I see your dilemma now. I wish that I had something of value to suggest as a means to open the communication channel. If you don't ease your relationship needs he may never come to the table; if you do ease them, you may be seen as weak or indecisive.

This is just an assumption on my part, but since the NC has been going on for awhile now, I assume that he is getting his emotional/attachment needs met by someone else. If that is indeed the case, he may not come around until that changes, even then there is no guarantee that he'll re-engage. This is not a suggestion, but, if you have reservations about establishing contact, your only option may be to wait him out. Again, not a suggestion, but you maybe could play the "less contact" card as a means to get the "more than friends" option on the table---minimal contact iniated by you but without "the talk" for awhile. Of course, if he crosses your "less contact" boundary or "no intimacy without a commitment" boundary you'll have to address that.
Logged
123Phoebe
Staying and Undecided
********
Offline Offline

What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Romantic partner
Posts: 2070



« Reply #38 on: August 16, 2015, 06:19:01 AM »

Phoebe, that's such an interesting answer. I do think it applies here. But what does it suggest about what I should do now? The insistence on talking doesn't seem helpful. I really am fine with so much about how things go with him. I tried being open and not imposing a bunch of stingy feeling boundaries, with the intention of clarifying my quite limited needs in order to continue like that at some point so he's not confused. I get that he needs me to take care of myself and I was/am. But as a result--I think as a result of his assumptions or fears about where I was going with the "talk"--we're dead in the water now. And somehow i've become "the woman who wants to talk about the r/ship." Am I missing something about how to take care of myself that could avoid this impasse?

Is there truth in you being, "the woman who wants to talk about the r/ship"?  Are you the type of person who likes to talk about the state of your relationship, needs clarification or to clarify?

"Acceptance" will take care of itself.

The issue of telling him that I can handle his reactions/behaviors ... .that is only coming up because several posts on this thread have asked me why I think things could change for us.  I think, someday, when we can really hear each other, this is something important for me to tell him.  

How well are you handling "his reactions/behaviors" now?  Because as MaybeSo has said, THIS is your relationship, right now, you're in it.

And no -- I wanted to "get him to the table" to make sure he knows that I am NOT OK with continued intimate connection under a "friends" framework and/or if he wants to see other women.

I'm pretty sure this is coming from my own values and judgment, I don't mean to offend, I'm curious... .

It's been 2 years since you've seen each other in person.  How are you so sure that you want or will be content in having an exclusive, committed relationship with him?  Is this in a way, putting the cart before the horse?



Logged
MaybeSo
Distinguished Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: Together five years, ended suddenly June 2011
Posts: 3680


Players only love you when they're playing...


« Reply #39 on: August 16, 2015, 09:08:07 AM »

Excerpt
I guess what is keeping me engaged -- why I got back in touch with him, why I wanted to talk -- is that when he was explaining why he "can't be trusted," his explanation was that "no one can handle my reactions." But I think I can. And he has no idea that I think that, or might be right. And it seems such a shame to just give up, if that's true. He's assuming it's just futile.

This is the pattern.

You make attempts to communicate something, and he goes away... .sometimes for months. And gets involved with others.

In this instance, he agreed before hand that he would be willing to speak with you about this... .but when push came to shove... .he reneged. So this is something he will continue to do, he is showing you what he will do.  Now he doesn't want to talk.  And you are getting the cold shoulder.

So when you say you are willing to deal with his reactions in a manner no one else is able to (his words) this is part of what he is talking about and this is what you are signing up for.  Right?  I keep getting the feeling you are saying you are willing to live with and be fine with his reactions as they happen in 'the future'  that you want him to know you are okay with his future reactions... .but it's actually happening right now. It' not in the future, it's here right now.  He is reacting right now.  Are you okay with his reaction right now?

If your true intent is to make clear to him that you are fine with everything he does (other than fidelity) than you need only live it while he is does what he does. Right now. He is reacting right now like he often does and will continue to do so.  It will be over something else next time, but it will be a similar reaction.

This is part of what he does.

Part of the pattern is your sense that this could have somehow been avoided (and this engages you)... .that it's always a misunderstanding or something you did that pushed him away that could have been avoided if only if only if only... .when really it's not.  It isn't about you.  Yes you have your own part in it, but bottom line he is not up for the intimacy you are asking him for.  That includes having grown-up talks that couples sometimes have.  And certainly not about grown-up stuff like commitment. What he is doing right now... .is part of what he is talking about when he says no one can handle his reactions. Most people are not going to put up with this b/c it's just so limited and when he bails it's so disrupting.  That makes sense that most people don't put up with his reactions.  

You say you are willing to do this and not have the kind of response you had in the past.  You know he will get grumpy, pull away, and eventually come back. You are fine with this. That's good cause he is doing it right now.

Are you handling his reactions differently than you have in the past?

How does it feel to you to be in this place again?

Are you really fine with this?

You know my opinion is that any experience can be beneficial if you frame it a certain way and if you are digging into your own growth edge.  What is your growth edge here?

Logged

patientandclear
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: single
Posts: 2785



« Reply #40 on: August 16, 2015, 09:29:05 AM »

Phoebe, that's such an interesting answer. I do think it applies here. But what does it suggest about what I should do now? The insistence on talking doesn't seem helpful. I really am fine with so much about how things go with him. I tried being open and not imposing a bunch of stingy feeling boundaries, with the intention of clarifying my quite limited needs in order to continue like that at some point so he's not confused. I get that he needs me to take care of myself and I was/am. But as a result--I think as a result of his assumptions or fears about where I was going with the "talk"--we're dead in the water now. And somehow i've become "the woman who wants to talk about the r/ship." Am I missing something about how to take care of myself that could avoid this impasse?

Is there truth in you being, "the woman who wants to talk about the r/ship"?  Are you the type of person who likes to talk about the state of your relationship, needs clarification or to clarify?

No, I don't think so.  More the opposite.  I was definitely guilty during the few three+ years of all this of not discussing it at all.  Assuming I knew.  That was the very request he made of me this spring -- that in the future, I please not assume I knew what he felt, but tell him how I felt, so he'd have a chance to alter his behavior so as not to lose me again.  That appears to have been the kind of person he wants to be rather than the place he's really in now, but no, I have been the opposite of the woman who wants to talk about the r/ship.

Excerpt
"Acceptance" will take care of itself.

Phoebe, can you explain what you mean here?

The issue of telling him that I can handle his reactions/behaviors ... .that is only coming up because several posts on this thread have asked me why I think things could change for us.  I think, someday, when we can really hear each other, this is something important for me to tell him.  

How well are you handling "his reactions/behaviors" now?  Because as MaybeSo has said, THIS is your relationship, right now, you're in it.[/quote]
i"m handling this OK except for the part where I feel like I painted him/us into an inadvertent corner and wish I could figure out a way to let us out.  My life is intact, I'm engaged in it, I don't feel rejected by him, all is OK -- except I feel like I derailed us.

Excerpt
And no -- I wanted to "get him to the table" to make sure he knows that I am NOT OK with continued intimate connection under a "friends" framework and/or if he wants to see other women.

I'm pretty sure this is coming from my own values and judgment, I don't mean to offend, I'm curious... .

It's been 2 years since you've seen each other in person.  How are you so sure that you want or will be content in having an exclusive, committed relationship with him?  Is this in a way, putting the cart before the horse?

We did actually see each other about three weeks ago.  He came up here and visited--his initiative.  As always, it was lovely.  That isn't really the core of your question though.  I'm not in a position where I'd sign up to marry the guy tomorrow, if that makes sense. We'd just be re-learning each other and what being in an acknowledged r/ship is like.  We have in fact been in an intimate r/s off and on for four years, so I don't think it's a question of not knowing each other well enough.  I do ask myself a lot whether it would be best to just start off without any assumptions or promises and see where it goes.  The problem for me is: I did that already.  It was beautiful.  And what he did with it, and with the gift of no strings and no promises, was he moved, and he started see other women.  What works for him is to have me as the super intimate emotional "wife" and to explore explicitly romantic stuff with other women.  I need him to know NOW that that will be the end of our super intimate emotional partnership (we've been down this exact road before, I withdrew, he was so hurt and mad, it was 4 months before he tried to reconnect and 15 months before we had a meaningful conversation).  I think this is the point where we know, and we are making meaningful choices about what to try.  I tried the Leonard Cohen-style undefined thing.  I don't need a label, ring, to live in the same house, or the same town.  But I do need him to understand that he needs to "choose me" and that other women are not compatible with this, for me, no matter what we're calling this.



Logged
sweetheart
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Romantic partner
Relationship status: Married, together 11 years. Not living together since June 2017, but still in a relationship.
Posts: 1230



« Reply #41 on: August 16, 2015, 10:03:02 AM »

But I do need him to understand that he needs to "choose me" and that other women are not compatible with this, for me, no matter what we're calling this.

p+c it is exactly this that is at the centre of all your threads, he can't give you what you need, he has told you this through his behaviour over and over.

What might be important for you to explore is what prevents you from hearing and accepting  this.

I'm not suggesting it is easy to hear or accept what you so badly need from him, but it seems to me your stuckness is within you, not him.
Logged

MaybeSo
Distinguished Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: Together five years, ended suddenly June 2011
Posts: 3680


Players only love you when they're playing...


« Reply #42 on: August 16, 2015, 10:19:45 AM »

Excerpt
i"m handling this OK except for the part where I feel like I painted him/us into an inadvertent corner and wish I could figure out a way to let us out.  My life is intact, I'm engaged in it, I don't feel rejected by him, all is OK -- except I feel like I derailed us.

It's good that your life is intact.  That's key.  However... .

You feel YOU derailed this?

YOU. 

Meaning... .in essence... .you have the power or ability to fix this or prevent him from doing what does?

I think this is part of your growth edge.

I would give this some serious thought and really question the veracity of your assumption. There is a bit of fantasy or magical thinking going on here.  If you had the power to derail this... .then you are also indicating you have the power to fix it or prevent derailment.  I don't think you have that kind of power or control.  Not even a little bit.  You were feeling much the same way in the past... .if only, if only... .

Logged

KateCat
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Posts: 2907


« Reply #43 on: August 16, 2015, 10:22:00 AM »

. . . he needs to "choose me" .

Hi, patientandclear,

I think I've read about 1,000 of your 1,955 beautifully written and intricately painful posts over the last three years.

I'm sorry to say that I haven't for one moment believed that he needs to choose you or that he ever has. (But certainly do believe that he would greatly value continuing to have you in his life. Who wouldn't?)

Is there any way you can let go of the "choose me" requirement?

(Cross-posted with MaybeSo, who's throwing you all the good questions.)





Logged
patientandclear
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: single
Posts: 2785



« Reply #44 on: August 16, 2015, 10:44:00 AM »

Excerpt
I guess what is keeping me engaged -- why I got back in touch with him, why I wanted to talk -- is that when he was explaining why he "can't be trusted," his explanation was that "no one can handle my reactions." But I think I can. And he has no idea that I think that, or might be right. And it seems such a shame to just give up, if that's true. He's assuming it's just futile.

This is the pattern.

You make attempts to communicate something, and he goes away... .sometimes for months. And gets involved with others.

In this instance, he agreed before hand that he would be willing to speak with you about this... .but when push came to shove... .he reneged. So this is something he will continue to do, he is showing you what he will do.  Now he doesn't want to talk.  And you are getting the cold shoulder.

So when you say you are willing to deal with his reactions in a manner no one else is able to (his words) this is part of what he is talking about and this is what you are signing up for.  Right?  I keep getting the feeling you are saying you are willing to live with and be fine with his reactions as they happen in 'the future'  that you want him to know you are okay with his future reactions... .but it's actually happening right now. It' not in the future, it's here right now.  He is reacting right now.  Are you okay with his reaction right now?

If your true intent is to make clear to him that you are fine with everything he does (other than fidelity) than you need only live it while he is does what he does. Right now. He is reacting right now like he often does and will continue to do so.  It will be over something else next time, but it will be a similar reaction.

This is part of what he does.

Part of the pattern is your sense that this could have somehow been avoided (and this engages you)... .that it's always a misunderstanding or something you did that pushed him away that could have been avoided if only if only if only... .when really it's not.  It isn't about you.  Yes you have your own part in it, but bottom line he is not up for the intimacy you are asking him for.  That includes having grown-up talks that couples sometimes have.  And certainly not about grown-up stuff like commitment. What he is doing right now... .is part of what he is talking about when he says no one can handle his reactions. Most people are not going to put up with this b/c it's just so limited and when he bails it's so disrupting.  That makes sense that most people don't put up with his reactions.  

You say you are willing to do this and not have the kind of response you had in the past.  You know he will get grumpy, pull away, and eventually come back. You are fine with this. That's good cause he is doing it right now.

Are you handling his reactions differently than you have in the past?

Very good points -- that this is it, this IS the pattern, and it isn't some exception brought about by a bad choice on my part.

I'm not handling the reactions differently than in the past, no, except it IS different from the very beginning, before I understood anything about any of this.  I'm good at handling this reaction, meaning, I don't draw big conclusions about him or us (many friends IRL would say I don't draw sufficient conclusions) and I go about my life.  My life is just fine in his absence.  I miss him, of course.

But ... .

Excerpt
How does it feel to you to be in this place again?

Are you really fine with this?

That is a really good question.  It feels crappy.  The guy told me to tell him what I need, told me he was up to discuss, I tried to, and suddenly, he's too fatigued by my demands and those of unnamed others to bother.  And, as both you & Apollotech pointed out, he's almost surely getting his needs met elsewhere. I'm not loving it, no.

Excerpt
You know my opinion is that any experience can be beneficial if you frame it a certain way and if you are digging into your own growth edge.  What is your growth edge here?

That is a very good question.  I will ponder that.

Logged
patientandclear
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: single
Posts: 2785



« Reply #45 on: August 16, 2015, 10:47:22 AM »

But I do need him to understand that he needs to "choose me" and that other women are not compatible with this, for me, no matter what we're calling this.

p+c it is exactly this that is at the centre of all your threads, he can't give you what you need, he has told you this through his behaviour over and over.

What might be important for you to explore is what prevents you from hearing and accepting  this.

I'm not suggesting it is easy to hear or accept what you so badly need from him, but it seems to me your stuckness is within you, not him.

Possibly.  But what makes this not so clear is what he says when we do talk.  If it were a case of him being happy with how his cycle goes, it would be as you say, but as he sometimes explains, he sometimes is very much not.  He sometimes wants this to go otherwise, and wants us to go otherwise.  I know it's been several years but our communication about this has been very episodic and generally has contained a lot of assumptions about what the other person wants needs and prefers.  He has called me on that and I think that is fair (though it's also why I'm finding his current decision not to discuss somewhat ... .odd and crappy).

In other words, if I become more sure that this is just how it is, I won't be stuck.
Logged
patientandclear
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: single
Posts: 2785



« Reply #46 on: August 16, 2015, 10:54:20 AM »

Is there any way you can let go of the "choose me" requirement?

Hi KC!

That's what he would love me to decide, for sure.

No, I don't think so.  The kind of vulnerability he achieves with me and the kind of intimacy he seeks, which is also what I enjoy about the r/ship, isn't compatible, for me, with him making love to another woman, telling her what he tells women -- that she makes him believe again that a deep true connection is really possible, and previously, he just picked the wrong women.  (Including me.)

I'm worth choosing and we are worth choosing.  Being a side dish isn't compatible with what I give him and what he asks me for.

I've certainly considered over the past couple of years whether this is necessarily true.  I've considered whether my stance on open r/ships is something I could let go of.  But.  I know what it felt like when I knew he was in bed with this other woman on Christmas Eve, was sharing my jokes with her kids, but wanted to Skype with me on Christmas Day after.  I had no one in my bed and there was no one telling me I was the love of his life.  It felt like crap.  I don't think I can sign on to that, and I think it's essential that he be clear on that.

Fundamental to all this stuff, I think, is truly knowing where our necessary boundaries really are.  I need not to feel used or taken for granted.  I need to feel I am worth some sacrifice to the person I give this much of my heart to.  That's just me.  Someone who felt differently would make a more convenient life long muse for him.  But it will strip something important away from me to sign up for that.

I hate Leonard Cohen, which pretty much sums it up. 
Logged
apollotech
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Posts: 792


« Reply #47 on: August 16, 2015, 11:04:16 AM »

P&C,

I am not clear in this, is he refusing communication or are you unwilling to open communications?
Logged
patientandclear
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: single
Posts: 2785



« Reply #48 on: August 16, 2015, 11:41:51 AM »

P&C,

I am not clear in this, is he refusing communication or are you unwilling to open communications?

Excellent question.  I guess the best answer is that we are both choosing not to communicate at this time.  I'd set aside this past Friday to go see him but that came and went with no word from him.  His last messages to me said his capacity to discuss this had long been exhausted and he wants us to be friends; and (separate message) he thanked me for something else I sent, and said this was an example of how it would be a shame if we were not friends.

My response to the first was that I heard him; that I had misunderstood his willingness or desire to discuss this; and to let me know if he found he was able to talk.  [Whence my concern that I made talking into an unintended ultimatum.]

Nothing since from either of us.  It's a quiet not very angry break.  On my part, I'm not mad, but I don't want to be confusing and continue on as we were if he truly wants to maintain terms where he can see other people and call us just friends.  On his part, I'm guessing he resents that I am conditioning our continued relationship on having this unwanted "talk," and is uncertain whether there is any level of communication I would welcome short of having the talk.  (I'd be OK with low level stuff, but neither of us finds that satisfying, we've long identified that that isn't really worth the effort.)
Logged
KateCat
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Posts: 2907


« Reply #49 on: August 16, 2015, 11:50:12 AM »

I hate Leonard Cohen, which pretty much sums it up. 

Smiling (click to insert in post)

But, man, you are so tenacious! I think you have the sheer power to outlast all these "unnamed others" and be the person in bed with him when he's old and frail.

If you "choose," of course.
Logged
HappyNihilist
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Posts: 1013



WWW
« Reply #50 on: August 16, 2015, 12:15:00 PM »

patientandclear, I hate to see you struggling with this.   Your pwBPD reminds me in a lot of ways of my exBPDbf. I understand the 'if only' thoughts.

He is important to you, and you care a lot about him. You want to have him in your life somehow. There's nothing wrong with that at all, and it's very understandable.

I just think it might help to step back a little and look at what you're saying. In your own words.

the kind of intimacy he seeks, which is also what I enjoy about the r/ship, isn't compatible, for me, with him making love to another woman, telling her what he tells women

Being a side dish isn't compatible with what I give him and what he asks me for.

You know what feels right for you. You know what your needs and boundaries are.

The question you are asking underneath it all is - can he accept those needs and boundaries?

I don't think I can sign on to that, and I think it's essential that he be clear on that.

The truth is - I think he is clear on that.

That's why he's behaving the way he is. He knows what you need, and he also knows that he can't give you what you need.

I need not to feel used or taken for grantedI need to feel I am worth some sacrifice to the person I give this much of my heart to. 

Do you believe that a relationship with him - as he is - would leave you not feeling used or taken for granted? What, besides pledging fidelity, could he do that would make you not feel this way?

What if he can't give you what you need? Where do you go from there?

Someone who felt differently would make a more convenient life long muse for him.  But it will strip something important away from me to sign up for that.

A relationship where you're compromising your needs and values will indeed eat away at you. You deserve a relationship that doesn't do so.

You're saying, in short, that you can't sign up for what he's able to give you.

I'm worth choosing and we are worth choosing.

 

You are worth choosing. You believe that your relationship with him is worth choosing. I have no doubt that he wants to keep you in his life. You're an absolutely lovely person, and he would be a fool not to want you in his life.

But does that mean he feels that a monogamous committed relationship is worth choosing? Regardless of who it is with? This isn't personal to you. It's not necessarily that he doesn't feel you're 'worth it' - it's that he just can't do it.

On his part, I'm guessing he resents that I am conditioning our continued relationship on having this unwanted "talk," and is uncertain whether there is any level of communication I would welcome short of having the talk.

You're treading into mind-reading territory here... .and no good can come of that. Instead of trying to figure out his assumptions and what he might be thinking - look at your own thoughts, assumptions, and needs.

I know you love him and want him in your life, and that you are strong enough to deal with his behavior. But what if there's truly no way that he can be in your life in the way that you need? Are you willing to redefine your expectations to have a relationship with him? That's certainly doable.

However, what you seem to be saying is that you are firm in not redefining those expectations, because to do so would make you feel like you were sacrificing an important part of yourself and your self-worth. You need to protect and take care of yourself - it shows a lot of strength and self-awareness to not want to sacrifice your values.

Even though he may want to give you what you need, as he is now, he cannot. The chance of him being able to change is very minimal.

This seems to be the real roadblock. Not miscommunication about a 'talk.' The impasse that you find yourselves at is that you fundamentally need different things. Neither of you is willing or able to redefine your needs to bring them into alignment.
Logged
patientandclear
********
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Relationship status: single
Posts: 2785



« Reply #51 on: August 16, 2015, 12:44:52 PM »

The impasse that you find yourselves at is that you fundamentally need different things. Neither of you is willing or able to redefine your needs to bring them into alignment.

HN, thanks so much for posting.  I always appreciate what you write and often identify with your reflections.

Here's the thing.  If this guy were wandering through the world saying he wanted to be free to be non-monogamous, to have open relationships, yeah, I could just say that doesn't work for me.  A man I was somewhat interested in about three years ago presented me with that package.  Easy for me to say no.  What he wants and what I want don't match.

I have now written and said the words "what we need and can give don't match" to this BPD guy in my life quite a few times.  He does not agree.  He does NOT accept that he is a person who can't be monogamous.  Like the guy MaybeSo writes about, my person is saying there IS a woman he will be monogamous with and not react this way to.  He just hasn't met her yet.  Meanwhile, I rock and am awesome and we have an amazing relationship ... .so, let's do this thing!

My dilemma is that I don't think he knows what he wants.  Or rather, what he wants is not a real thing.  We ARE a real thing and we ARE pretty awesome.  Except for this non-alignment of how we should set up our expectations and how we should think of what we do.

Again, easier to walk away from that if he wasn't saying he DOES want exactly what I do.  He just has decided we cannot be the ones who do that thing because I'm a real person, not a perfect woman who never makes him feel weird or scared or controlled or rejected or hurt.  From among those women who DO make him feel that, I'm definitely just about his favorite.

AND ALSO, he says ... .please please please please don't throw away our amazing relationship just because it's not certain I can allow it to become something else.

Is it really so obvious how to handle this or what my stance should be?  I decided this spring that rather than being so black and white about it, I should engage and let the back and forth be a learning process for us both.  I'll show up honest and more or less unafraid, and we'll see where we get over time.  I don't see this guy as a finished product, I guess, and the "he won't change" thing ... .well, he won't change unless he wants to change.  I can't change him.  But I can be a good reason to consider changing.
Logged
apollotech
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Ex-romantic partner
Posts: 792


« Reply #52 on: August 16, 2015, 12:45:06 PM »

I'd be OK with low level stuff, but neither of us finds that satisfying, we've long identified that that isn't really worth the effort.

P&C,

This ^^^^ is what I was speaking of in an earlier post. This "limited communication" may be your entrance into getting the "no intimacy without a commitment and monogamy" talk onto the table. I understand that this type of talk is superficial and not engaging, but it is communication. It is the doorway. Are you perhaps avoiding this avenue as a means to not get a concrete answer? That would be defensive hope at play. The side product of said defensive hope is anxiety.

HappyNihilist has made some excellent points and has raised an excellent question: What are your plans if this talk does not produce the results you hope that it will? To add onto that thought, have you explored other opportunities, dated other men in the three year NC span?
Logged
EaglesJuju
Retired Staff
*
Offline Offline

What is your sexual orientation: Straight
Who in your life has "personality" issues: Parent
Posts: 1654



« Reply #53 on: August 17, 2015, 11:01:32 AM »

Staff only


This thread has reached its post limit, and is now closed. This is a worthwhile topic, and you are free to start a new thread to continue the conversation. Thanks for your understanding... .
Logged

"In order to take control of our lives and accomplish something of lasting value, sooner or later we need to Believe. We simply need to believe in the power that is within us, and use it." -Benjamin Hoff
Can You Help Us Stay on the Air in 2021?

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Our 2021 Financial Sponsors
We are all appreciative of the members who provide the funding to keep BPDFamily on the air.
12years
alterK
Andi1956
Anondad
Cnvi
doghouse
drained1996
EyesUp
Harri
JD2028
lovenature
Mac5
Methuen
Mommydoc
Mutt
old97
P.F.Change
Skip
snowglobe
Swimmy55
Teno
Turkish
wendydarling

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2020, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!