Hi AaZz...I totally know how you feel!  My uBPDh's cycle has been 2ish weeks of being at a 2, then a couple of days of being at a 10...then back to the 2!  I feel like I have spent so many cycles longing for the 10 phase, and when it hit, believing that it would last, just for him to split to a 2 a couple of days later.  I used to notice myself loosening up, communicating more, being my true self, just to put up a thick wall a day or two later.  This has worn me out both physically and mentally.  You never know when either phase is going to hit, so you are "on edge" all the time.  Like you, I am trying to keep myself stable, and to teach the kids to stay stable, no matter his mood, but it isn't easy!  For me, its the not knowing when the switch, either direction, is going to happen, its so hard to organize life!  I wish I had a suggestion, I don't, but I do totally understand where you are coming from. 

hotchip- Abuse (which can be of several kinds), especially child abuse, is my bottom line. However, for my father and yours, their marriage was theirs. Each of us acted according to what we believed was the ethical thing to do, but it was a case of conflicting values. Estrangement is hurtful no matter who makes the choice. In some cases, and I believe yours is one of them, it's necessary- to not allow someone to physically harm you or pretend it's ok.  It's your father's choice to have allowed this to happen and it's your choice to not comply with that.

In my situation, the family rule was to appease and comply with BPD mother and to stay silent about it no matter what. But when I believed doing so would be potentially harmful to others, including myself,  I would not do that. For my parents, this was unacceptable. That was their choice to make.

I agree. The situations I see here that seem to have the most personal suffering is sometimes a conflict of ethics, not someone being right or wrong.

Most people on this board aren't posting about breaking up their marriages or cutting contact with family members because of minor issues. Most are highly committed to their relationships. Dilemmas are along the line of "how can I have a relationship with my parents without it upsetting my BPD spouse" and there's no choice that doesn't have difficult consequences. Either the spouse will be upset or there's the pain of severing ties with parents, or siblings, friends, family members, in order to keep from upsetting the pwBPD.

These are not "normal" choices. I don't think it's common or even acceptable, in the absence of serious issues, to insist that a spouse not have contact with members of their family of origin. However, these are some of the choices people face on these boards and each choice has difficult consequences. 

From my own experience, I would say my father enabled and justified my disordered mother's behaviour quite a bit. He wanted to keep the peace and placate her. (People in the culture they are from and of their generation basically don't divorce). One of his sayings was, 'she's just like that'.

She was 'just like that' when she bloodied my face, or instructed me to kill myself, or threatened to murder-suicide me, or....

I was estranged from my father for some years as a result. I did see him as a collaborator. I think having this as my model of what a relationship should look like has had a very bad effect on my assessment of relationships in adult life.

That's just one story.

It's a great point and it's a complete contradiction- who's right or wrong?  That's why I don't think we can "judge it" that way since it depends so much on perspective.

Also consider that some here complaining about being cut off, or those doing the cutting off, may have BPD traits that led them to do so.  Again, how do we judge who's just and who's not?  I don't think we can in any meaningful way.

Instead, I think we can only meet people where they're at, provide peer support, and help them cope with a troubling time...even if they ultimately caused it on their own.  Even if they're "dead wrong" in how they got to this place.

How do we do that?  By providing hope, by discussing healthier communication tactics, by encouraging things like empathy and forgiveness.  Then of course, helping others focus on self-care during their struggles and finding more productive ways to deal with grief and heartache.

Those things are benefits regardless of who's "right" or "wrong", healthy or mentally ill.  Ultimately, it's learning to let go of the hurt while finding methods to avoid the same path all over again in the future.

I’m wondering if anyone can identify.
Every so often (Once a year? Year and a half?) my wife will drop all her bpd traits.  It’s like she becomes a different person - her eyes are different, her voice is different, her speech patterns are different, she’s smiley and chatty and pleasant.  It’s like she’s broken out of a bubble and can see reality. I’ve tried to find language to describe it, and the closest thing that feels right is to say she seems “lucid.”  Sometimes these phases last a week, sometimes a couple of months.  99% of the time it corresponds with some kind of of med update or change - doesn’t matter which med or what kind of alteration.  But although the length of clarity varies, it always ends.
You would think these times would be great.  Enjoy them while they last!  She’s engaging, actually shows an interest in me and my thoughts.  But for me it’s the total opposite..  I am so unsettled, it’s unnerving, I don’t feel safe, I don’t know how to act.  I hate these phases.  In part I think I’ve learned how to navigate her disregulation, how to validate without wanting my side to be heard, how to handle projection, offense, triangulation, fear/obligation/guilt, to protect boundaries.  So when all of those things are gone, I have no idea how to act.  Who am I?  How do we engage now?
Also, I know these times never last.  I don’t want to start engaging like I would with a normal person and then get broadsided when things randomly snap back.
And anything I say during these times  will be remembered once she’s back in the bubble.  She might honestly and sincerely be interested in my thoughts and feelings, coax them out, even handle my response perfectly fine.  But then 3 weeks later if she’s back to being disregulated, she will remember the things I said 2 weeks earlier, but now through the lens of offense which I had felt safe from.  It’s like saying something perfectly fine to Sméagol, but if you do, Gollum is going to find out later.
All of this is feels horrible to live through.  Especially because she IS caring and concerned during these times of lucidity/clarity.  Her eyes are off herself.  Why are you so quiet? Why are you not talking? Why do you seem so down?  I am no more quiet or down than normal - she is just noticing for the first time. 
I don’t want to be protective during the rough patches and super up during the good times.  I desire stability, consistency, even/steady.  Whether she’s at a 2 or a 10, I want to hang out at a 7.5.  Which *feels* lousy when she’s at a 10 and I’m trying to maintain my 7.5.
I almost feel released the next time she snaps and projects on me.
Is this common? Rare? Super unhealthy? Anyone have advice on how to navigate the “good” times?

I walked that "honor your parents" line to the best I could, but when it seemed to require allowing what I considered to be emotional abuse to me or my children, that was a limit. I didn't expect my father to leave my mother, and he didn't. I know he did what he felt he needed to do.

However it invoved emotional hurt to other family members. It's not about anything in the past or judging them right or wrong. It's the dilemma of when choosing to appease them involves us collaborating with doing something that violates our own ethics- wherever we put that line.

I'm trying to avoid specific details, but when the family "rule" is to remain silent and comply, and doing so is against our own values- how does one make that choice?

To put this to an extreme example- if your wife insisted you rob a bank and you wanted to keep the peace and stand by her, would you do it? This is not something that happened but it's an example of where does one draw the line and refuse, even if it causes an extreme reaction.

On the family board, adult children struggle with the idea of going NC with a disordered parent even in the event of extreme abuse. It is a last resort when other attempts have failed. Yet on the parent board are numerous grieving mothers in law whose adult children have cut them off, seemingly for no fault on their part. I'm not judging right or wrong here but noting that there are hurtful consequences to choices like this.

If we're talking biblical, 1st Corinthians 13 describes how to love.  It starts with love is patient, love is kind and goes on to say love is not self-seeking, it keeps no record of wrongs, etc.

You might think, "But that's not how my mom loved us.  She was wrong!"  I agree completely.  But the definition on how to love doesn't take into account how we're treated, it's how we're supposed to love others regardless of how we're treated.  That doesn't mean to blindly accept abuse either...but we still lovingly step back or hold our tongues when needed (or try to at least...which I failed to do hundreds of times).

In other words, it's not about right and wrong.  Your dad did his best with the cards he was dealt.  In the end, he loved your mother more than he hated her illness and that's what guided him.  Was he wrong?  Well yes, because it was impossible for him to be right- either you or your mom was going to be upset with him.  I'm sure that he did the best he could in an impossible circumstance.

The 'leave your parents and cling to your spouse' is referring to a Biblical marriage where two become one under God.  That certainly doesn't describe every marriage in the world today because God is left out of the equation.  Even in the secular world though, it's seen as good practice to value your spouse over other relationships to have a long, happy marriage.  But once you mix in mental illness, it becomes infinitely more complicated.  That brings me back to 1st Corinthians 13 on how we're called to love...which is why I stayed.  My wife being "wrong" didn't justify me walking away in my mind.

Any family being torn apart is tragic, and I believe that's why the Bible is against divorce except in a few narrow circumstances (adultery, unbeliever walking away, abusive relationships).  Even in those cases though, the believer is supposed to try to reconcile before walking away.  In your specific situation, maybe it would have led to a better outcome since your dad would be more involved with your life and the grandkids lives.  That's our guess- we really don't know for sure.  But I can say for certain that your dad stayed to support your mom- not to hurt you or the grandkids.

I agree with you in terms of staying in a bad marriage just to stay- it's not healthy for anyone.  And I do think most marriages with BPD involved would reach that Biblical threshold of "abuse in the home" at some point.  Yet when you love someone and you've been codependent on them for years or decades, walking away is so incredibly difficult. 

Because of my faith, I never even considered it an option and honestly, I'd still be married to my ex today if she didn't walk away (while committing adultery, so my marriage literally met all three biblical criteria).  Sometimes, I still struggle with that, even though I'm remarried and have a fantastic life with an amazing woman who truly loves me for me.

One last Biblical verse you mentioned- honor thy mother and thy father.  That's hard when mom is mentally ill; I realize now that mine was too.  At times she was impossible to be around and would explode at the smallest things, but I still did my best to honor her and love her.  Did I get it right all the time?   Absolutely not.  But I did the best that I could and I definitely loved my mom. 

However, my mom thought the world of her grandkids and never tried to cause that rift (other than a few weeks here and there).  They were her entire world, especially my oldest who had BPD.  I was adopted, by the way, my mom couldn't have kids.  So to have BPD or mental illness in each generation around me was purely coincidence.  Or like a Freudian psychiatrist would say, I married my mother.  I don't know.

I think one of the difficulties with a pwBPD is that they are connected to other people in the family. So having boundaries with them can involve other people with whom we still want a close relationship with.

My father was a protector and enabler to my BPD mother. I never considered going NC with my mother. However, in college, I sought out counseling and the counselor brought up the topic of me doing that with BPD mother- because of the emotional effects on me of the relationship. So I tried it and it lasted one week, because any relationship with my father also included her and I wanted a relationship with him. My mother's FOO and some family friends also were "flying monkeys" to her.

I knew that the family expectation was compliance with BPD mother and I went along with this for the most part, and for many years, until going along with her wishes began to involve my adolescent children. In my family dynamics, I am not the golden child. My "value" to the family was based on my being useful to her, to do things for her- household tasks, emotional caretaking. She didn't look to my kids for that when they were younger but when they reached adolescence, I observed her enlisting my children into this role too. That was a bottom line for me. It isn't my children's jobs to be her emotional caretaker.

I didn't cut contact between her and my children but was protective during that contact. By that time, the kids also had a sense of discomfort around her. These were their natural boundaries. I wanted to respect that too. They had learned to treat her respectfully but I let them decide on how much contact they wanted with her. They were also old enough to understand mental illness and we discussed that. One of my kids didn't want contact with her at all, due to some experiences with her, another could handle some contact with her.

Young children have no choice when it comes to relationships with adults in the family. They are dependent on them. For older children, a relationship becomes more similar to one between two adults. If a child has a sense that someone is not a safe person for them to be close to- that is a protective boundary. We want to preserve this sense for them, so that they don't get into relationships with disordered people. If we force them to ignore it and force the relationship, we invalidate it.

Your children have no obligation to have a relationship with your sister. If there is contact in the context of a family event- like a wedding, or if they are all there together on a holiday with your parents- they can be expected to behave cordially. That's just being decent. But they aren't obligated to have contact with her otherwise if they don't want to.

Flying monkeys make having boundaries difficult. It's a part of the entire dynamics. Unfortunately, my having boundaries with BPD mother came with a cost. This is family dynamics- at first the effort is to get the person back into their previous role. If the person doesn't do that, they risk being "expelled" "exiled" from the unit.

My choice for a middle ground was lower contact  "LC". It may involve less contact but it also is the content of that contact. If we spoke, I kept the conversation light and cordial, and did not discuss personal or emotional information.

For me, this was a quieter, less dramatic choice to maintain personal boundaries while still having contact. How other family members responded to that was their choice. I remained cordial to the best of my abilities. My priority was to protect my children and not have them be partipants in this dynamic.

My best advice is to continue to stand up for what is important to you- your children, while remaining cordial to the FM in your family. If your mother brings up the topic of contact with your sister, politely state that you love her but this isn't something to discuss. Talking won't solve this for her. Remain calm and cordial but stand your ground. Unfortunately- they will react to this- but this is their choice to make. You can only control how you behave and how you treat other people.

It's hard to see your mother in distress, but also- to sacrifice your children's emotional well being to make her feel better is unreasonable. I never wanted to be in this position- but that was the result of this kind of dynamic.

I agree with CC43- I don't think being attractive causes mental illness or behavioral problems. I think if someone has BPD- being attractive is a way they get attention and their needs met.

If we look at genetic possibilty- we then ask how would these qualities "hot and crazy" prevail over time? I'm not using "crazy" to be derogatory towards someone with BPD or to women- using it in context of the meme. Just some ideas- I don't know for sure.

Evolution favors attractiveness. It's seen in many forms of life- there's a design to promote reproduction. Humans are more complex than this but there still is a favoring of attractiveness in people. So why isn't everyone attractive by now? Because other traits are favored too. For males, being a strong protector, hunter for food was also favored, independent of appearance. The gene pool is varied. Maybe- thinking back to before civilization, if a woman was disordered, they may not be protected as much by the tribe if they weren't pretty, but they'd keep the pretty one. Maybe if a woman was less attractive but a better nurturer, not disordered, they'd keep her too.

Humans have the distinction of having the ability to override instincts but we aren't wired differently from our ancient ancestors. Some of what makes up attraction is unconscious and instinctual. There's a woman who makes videos and she's a matchmaker for her own religion/culture but her comments about her matches have a wider application and she's got some interesting things to say. She discusses the most common preferences in her videos (while maintaining confidentiality for her applicants)   The choice to marry within a religion/culture is a big one but that's her only match pool so that one is taken care of. A requirement for her applicants is that they be honest about what they want. .

For the men, appearance is a main choice. They want younger than they are, and pretty. For the women, they want appearance but also being taller than they are, and a good provider. Not gold diggers- many have their own professions but someone who can provide security- this is more like wanting security and safety than materialistic. Sometimes it's a choice for the men too- that the woman is employed but they may also list that she'd be willing to cut back on work and raise the children.

She's honest about potentials for matching. A less attractive woman or less attractive man has more chances for a match if they have other qualities and preferences and are willing to be more flexible about them. For the men- if they are older, shorter, less attractive, having financial security increases their chances. For the women, they will have better chances with a less attractive man.

It may sound superficial to consider factors like looks but when it comes to attraction, these still are a part of what we call "chemistry". The preferences are different for men and women. Looks are high on the list for men. Looks are also high on the list for women, but so are other factors- height, and security. Maybe taller men were better protectors of the tribes in pre-civilized days? Also the ability to hunt for food would favor being taller and stronger?

Maybe this is why, a person who is disordered and attractive prevailed over time- as being attractive was a protective factor?

As to BPD/NPD- I don't think it's stable.  I think someone with NPD may get into a relationship with a BPD but then, once there's a split, it would end. Someone who doesn't have this combination might seem boring to them?